DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>,
	"Bie, Tiwei" <tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
	"maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 02/13] add vhost packed ring fast enqueue function
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:11:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <435a2d7c-4751-95e7-73d7-9e519a3a893a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E63334CE6@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>


On 2019/7/10 下午3:30, Liu, Yong wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 12:28 PM
>> To: Liu, Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>; Bie, Tiwei <tiwei.bie@intel.com>;
>> maxime.coquelin@redhat.com; dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 02/13] add vhost packed ring fast enqueue
>> function
>>
>>
>> On 2019/7/9 上午1:13, Marvin Liu wrote:
>>> In fast enqueue function, will first check whether descriptors are
>>> cache aligned. Fast enqueue function will check prerequisites in the
>>> beginning. Fast enqueue function do not support chained mbufs, normal
>>> function will handle that.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
>> Any reason for not letting compiler to unroll the loops?
>>
> Hi Jason,
> I'm not sure about how much compiler can help on unrolling loops as it can't know how much loops will create in one call.
> After force not using unroll-loop optimization by "-fno-unroll-loops", virtio_dev_rx_packed function size remained the same.
> So look like gcc unroll-loop optimization do not help here.


I meant something like "pragma GCC unroll N" just before the loop you 
want unrolled.

Thanks


>
> And fast enqueue function not only did unroll loop, it also checked cache alignment which can help performance in another side.
>
> Regards,
> Marvin
>
>> Thanks
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-11  4:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-08 17:13 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] vhost packed ring performance optimization Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 01/13] add vhost normal enqueue function Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 02/13] add vhost packed ring fast " Marvin Liu
     [not found]   ` <CGME20190708113801eucas1p25d89717d8b298790326077852c9933c8@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2019-07-08 11:37     ` Ilya Maximets
2019-07-09  1:15       ` Liu, Yong
2019-07-10  4:28   ` Jason Wang
2019-07-10  7:30     ` Liu, Yong
2019-07-11  4:11       ` Jason Wang [this message]
2019-07-11  9:49         ` Liu, Yong
2019-07-11  9:54           ` Jason Wang
2019-08-13  9:02             ` Liu, Yong
2019-07-11  8:35   ` Jason Wang
2019-07-11  9:37     ` Liu, Yong
2019-07-11  9:44       ` Jason Wang
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 03/13] add vhost packed ring normal dequeue function Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 04/13] add vhost packed ring fast " Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 05/13] add enqueue shadow used descs update and flush functions Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 06/13] add vhost fast enqueue flush function Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 07/13] add vhost dequeue shadow descs update function Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 08/13] add vhost fast dequeue flush function Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 09/13] replace vhost enqueue packed ring function Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 10/13] add vhost fast zero copy dequeue " Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 11/13] replace vhost " Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 12/13] support inorder in vhost dequeue path Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 13/13] remove useless vhost functions Marvin Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=435a2d7c-4751-95e7-73d7-9e519a3a893a@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).