From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>,
Gregory Etelson <gregory@weka.io>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: use get_mempolicy(2) to find numa socket on Linux
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 16:18:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4398639.Xci2ANazcN@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bbfaa04-fa99-8c2a-c0ec-a91059809b73@intel.com>
21/06/2017 17:49, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
> I think following the discussion of libnuma dependency in another thread
> [1], you would need to implement a similar approach and keep the old
> method while providing this alternative if libnuma is present.
Considering that libnuma becomes mandatory to build DPDK on NUMA-capable
systems, we can assume there is only one CPU socket if libnuma is
unavailable.
> As Ilya mentions in the thread, this is usually the job of tools such as
> autotools, cmake or meson but given that we do not have such tools in
> DPDK yet, we rely in a build time config option for libnuma.
>
> Given that we already have a libnuma config option for VHOST, we might
> be adding anew one for hugepage balancing, I think it would make sense
> to just have single CONFIG_RTE_LIBNUMA option instead.
>
> Thoughts?
I am not sure about merging every NUMA options into one.
It may be interesting to track different NUMA features requiring libnuma.
Anyway, this patch needs to be rebased now that Ilya's patch is applied.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-01 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-18 15:52 Gregory Etelson
2017-06-21 15:49 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2017-07-01 14:18 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-07-03 14:11 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2017-07-03 14:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4398639.Xci2ANazcN@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gregory@weka.io \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=i.maximets@samsung.com \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).