From: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@oss.nxp.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>, Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] examples/l3fwd: make data struct to be memory efficient
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:52:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <451828ff-f122-0204-458e-7656845b44ed@oss.nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALBAE1Pdj5Kq+6Qt=DaFKKg20Aj-s7wD8ywOBMCY1=W1qXd-hA@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/14/2021 12:36 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 3:56 PM Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> wrote:
>> There are some holes in data struct lcore_conf. The holes are
>> due to alignment requirement.
>>
>> For struct lcore_rx_queue, there is no need to make every element
>> of this type to be cache line aligned, because the data is not
>> shared between cores.
>>
>> Member len of struct mbuf_table can be moved out. So data can be
>> packed and there will be no need to load an extra cache line when
>> mbuf table is empty.
>>
>> The change showed slight performance improvement on N1SDP platform.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> This change alone is OK in the octeontx2 platform.(No difference in performance)
> combining with 3/4 shows some regression. Probably is due to prefetch
> or 128B cache line tuning specifics.
We checked it on Layerscape LS2088A platform. No difference for 1-2 core
case. However observing ~2% regression for 4-8 cores.
Regards,
Hemant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-21 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 10:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] examples/l3fwd: tune prefetch for better performance Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 18:50 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-13 20:00 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-19 7:52 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 18:40 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 17:43 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-14 6:02 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] examples/l3fwd: make data struct to be memory efficient Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 19:06 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-21 5:22 ` Hemant Agrawal [this message]
2021-04-26 10:55 ` Walsh, Conor
2021-04-27 1:19 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 8:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 17:33 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-16 9:39 ` Ling, WeiX
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] " Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] examples/l3fwd: reorganize code for better performance Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-06 18:34 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-06 18:39 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-10 6:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-10 6:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-10 6:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-05 8:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] l3fwd improvements David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=451828ff-f122-0204-458e-7656845b44ed@oss.nxp.com \
--to=hemant.agrawal@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).