From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9070243EF9; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 21:10:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1576D40691; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 21:10:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wfout6-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfout6-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.149]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACD340689; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 21:10:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailfout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6271C0009F; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 15:10:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Apr 2024 15:10:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1713985810; x=1714072210; bh=vUMr9ZoPOU0IOuI/iN4OHvw1hgFva4GvYWI6gHOdbcw=; b= Sh1sQ6j6EpkXlyEx9viri2eb3+00XsgAUwId1JpnAJsf8xJEcQP2KS+203nLN6dX IjSQl+5+veL5M0uODxMYlu5VYG5F9ou+RP+IUcJlqNYQrcXWrFKm6bjYM9lCqZpS ymoVudzwz1oX0tbxYQy0fSSMQ0ohNXgpOJ1arm7b8fMZmcVc3HA/bdJ1205dZK5/ z+ekQx3ApxFGvrncRKol+Rm3h/iw/D0+UU/hDP8BKizf/mr5mbjUZeJps/jf2kgA M/noV8Epm8k0leOwGbD+6lt7BGDWWDYcJHHVQJGPHwDVHHXRimq5OQeYXGKE76/Q yzxlSG7ZiADLFA+ibw01Jg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1713985810; x= 1714072210; bh=vUMr9ZoPOU0IOuI/iN4OHvw1hgFva4GvYWI6gHOdbcw=; b=D XMWGR82qXGVHEAjXIGTx1Mp4zsf5Y2I/Kj+CE1e1ukZEb7hUdEmlWyNwu7mhOioF uC2Lomfd9u/UFk0LoJW1OIVdUVEIFjjY5zwBqDGBRn8XW0UWs3RUPopUoQUVieoD vuzuLW4Ea1hsYQrsfX75hrjH/EeJPVgYcf2tIvKOV/0a1g/qaCuVh26fBbI/h89h OEG/HG2MbBRz0kOD9N4MraFpyhHN9af0ehM24c8MNYy+f4yJ4hMLOt79QwrI1Ppj KbwMDxchhtBs5cHexXBodMvlGijEDGUcqgbMFQN/JDoPZO6kqpqtEyWanT04htLj DXkoUAtGgntaQe+Op20Xg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudelhedgjeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegtddtleejjeegffekkeektdejvedtheevtdekiedvueeuvdei uddvleevjeeujeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 15:10:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Morten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= Cc: dev@dpdk.org, techboard@dpdk.org Subject: Re: Minutes of DPDK Technical Board Meeting, 2024-04-03 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 21:10:06 +0200 Message-ID: <4585113.cEBGB3zze1@thomas> In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F3E4@smartserver.smartshare.dk> References: <9317330.rMLUfLXkoz@thomas> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F3E4@smartserver.smartshare.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 24/04/2024 19:25, Morten Br=C3=B8rup: > > Inlining should be avoided in public headers because of ABI > > compatibility issue > > and structures being exported because of inline requirement. >=20 > This sounds like a techboard decision, which I don't think it was. > Suggested wording: >=20 > A disadvantage of inlining in public headers is ABI compatibility issues = and structures being exported because of inline requirement. >=20 >=20 > Perhaps I'm being paranoid, and the phrase "should be" already suffices. >=20 > Whichever wording you prefer, > ACK This is the final report sent to dev@dpdk.org :) Yes I think the word "should" reflect what was said during the meeting without any formal vote.