From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82D0A046B for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:25:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB97316B; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:25:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B56D2E8F; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:25:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F1721F83; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 11:25:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 11:25:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=UjDT4vl1gsbt0ymmpJUwV73QZdJrWAHuZvXnclcwyY0=; b=mZJNLab7GTqd 6jfIrV2hxAHbrJEgMzuke77BaFzx7RX/aMMC6zSOkQzpxEmKS1LwWFfwt8AlpMwB EY7OVr6GTEpTzVVHflpyVRfmx63uGCEc9BKnDeKMiHzyn3PAG9iGusRKRjS0OjYB aGWkaPr1gzUv235eP+EMdq7HCZrsE30= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=UjDT4vl1gsbt0ymmpJUwV73QZdJrWAHuZvXnclcwy Y0=; b=tIllJYfAlWUNovC0w3hBc+RXgYBr/9feQnMZsT4p42qie2nKfpH/vONrP 4/QCJC2foJ4V5E3ubhY0HHOZUTSAwItMKXKewXBVbfpLQgv8b8xbwglQ93yN8rEr 9c7Le4edkEPblyS6y3qI1Rl1rpb4ex3caZ+gXdCEhA3kE5fJqjARai3VtyVeyJfZ cJrtoMP0uOW0v2zTEbO29KNaUJSD+ey2EnpoQb4mwD/Xwb4+OuvYw+h1dk3Bsubd 9mOaA2GrbPHifE5vIsMJFuROdifUBu8L11Pe9vnCEyfh8GJuhTAjt3IzI9L6hc8B xuCWPeq/ik8llS14KrJ6OdSPDRyag== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudekgdeklecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B8F9C80065; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 11:25:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger , dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com Cc: stable@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:25:49 +0200 Message-ID: <45932331.afuT3IvSH9@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190626160910.5cb109fe@hermes.lan> References: <20190626104056.26829-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20190626140234.12394-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20190626160910.5cb109fe@hermes.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] eal/linux: fix return after alarm registration failure X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 27/06/2019 01:09, Stephen Hemminger: > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:02:34 +0200 > Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > When adding an alarm, if an error happen when registering > > the common alarm callback, it is not considered as a major failure. > > The alarm is then inserted in the list. > > However it was returning an error code after inserting the alarm. > > > > The error code is not set anymore to be consistent with the behaviour. > > > > Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > --- > > v2: do not use variable ret > > Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger Applied