From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CB9A00C5; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 16:26:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64DD406B4; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 16:26:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3B64021E; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 16:26:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A5E32001FF; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 10:26:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 08 Jul 2022 10:26:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1657290389; x= 1657376789; bh=9uVg78ioOey3jcH+ZzKDsB0ocYnvI7+krIlHHAty17c=; b=w U9jkGSU3o7b1DHUFTdLhAZVCkvdPINavGg0TJY+/Gj4L4rvVAmtH8y07RltcpFoR 1dhv9JDi+LTWaB2rIJw3tARHAqa1/86jgKOcqgzhcNzmp7LuSTsY0S+i3hNMtBxH 0EA0NXrNOjkKDTG4+4/9Hm7/3WxL/P8MZGLIo+LsICGQbgOTZnrRnx3TDevuimxx 6bq7fAeN8aVolQVt8/B0PgtEZ2MkF+lzpZFFGhNvxqMl9JQpH4AwPPfblbJh+ZtW QEwoZFqyfjHdOGgJ1ATq6DXC6I2RLXlL5uj0/iQj+DaYyrMnW7hJPRLLi2qjWGAP i0eRFmfMWXfOiiI3ocatw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1657290389; x= 1657376789; bh=9uVg78ioOey3jcH+ZzKDsB0ocYnvI7+krIlHHAty17c=; b=o Y6G4sZwSyqQn/l+/4UvlaNtMAQJEMSJLFjBXnc91CushEVVX0nfwqUhPxeEjenla QHKRz1aNHTXBrO7qYSHbR1iUT/1b6uhlZH+WMzQjRdkTnTOpk5PZBHd4madKxpv9 hTccUu2kQ8UT+OwsX0IIsFAgvYoYKymqWUudLLD1u975Y8iKk9aM0xnCRlNWk7EX JtkoPM326CFw7Kn4mMgmwfPR2gEL1sMeyWr4PB//LbEuD6DJfmPcB9aeWpZNeUpV 8L8gQlDDK49h7RLLIwkleX2NvMDzULzcOhb73OBec5ua7sCAEfyWxD5dnVup2b1o Dy4gfxbG/ApNT4DKyGHdg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudeijedgjeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtjeeiieefhedtfffgvdelteeufeefheeujefgueetfedttdei kefgkeduhedtgfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 10:26:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Timothy McDaniel Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerinj@marvell.com, jerinjacobk@gmail.com, stable@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] DLB2: cq_weight fixes Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 16:26:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4621719.8FI41Ny9JD@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20220706214628.2375117-1-timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com> References: <20220706213141.2374006-2-timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com> <20220706214628.2375117-1-timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 06/07/2022 23:46, Timothy McDaniel: > This patch series contains the following: > - fix coverity issue 379234 > - improve error reporting for cq_weight feature > > Changes since V1 > - fixed a repeated word in the commit message of patch 1 > > Timothy McDaniel (2): > event/dlb2: fix cq_weight array overflow > event/dlb2: improve cq_weight error messages Should we merge those patches in 22.07-rc4? No risk?