From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com (mail-we0-f176.google.com
 [74.125.82.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677705911
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 22:08:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id w62so5639372wes.35
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:09:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=9rQcgUPh2l4yzk4OaM6fOQzkuTLrEYqeMi5i4UdUq/8=;
 b=A/Nu9WbYKgyMy9ljnvEcfhZDZYLj1AeqKkbkNNsgTyGXdSq5jNhdRjeUzAxEZlKRMI
 zi47Rkn9Z6F4vtucKqeqWHfD9eltv7Og2ES/sg1lsJD9HRyg/tDbrJQaamsCbcmuvyRO
 ELrT3alqbfLGqTjZshNO8ksUHD6qy5i+iHW7KvVMNUy4sDLq28Wm4t5Tp+69pBKOSF1O
 +T2v31tJwQBX/dO5QxDzSDRKkz3z476yjCHDozVx5HF1WLm/tE4l8fxM5mvAdlzTtKwO
 IwjcaE1VFLWlHh/SczQAoIb4O5ZUYLIEvuXJzONVhepdGnMbRfBTft5rAyX/MLWFa6Nz
 FyaQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnVst5Pzz4GPND7zXu/KTKnHP/YU/ZYUuydPNfG0937cRrnh93tuTQB9U82wabl7HxlEHFm
X-Received: by 10.194.189.42 with SMTP id gf10mr22176653wjc.24.1386709769397; 
 Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:09:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from x220.localnet (abo-107-62-68.mts.modulonet.fr. [85.68.62.107])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 xl18sm8479067wib.9.2013.12.10.13.09.28 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:09:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: GongJinrong <jinronggong@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 22:09:27 +0100
Message-ID: <462237291.xmhSuQ6GWE@x220>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.4 (Linux/3.12.3-1-ARCH; KDE/4.11.4; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <COL131-DS22A1D0FFBAE5E726E34810B7D20@phx.gbl>
References: <mailman.0.1386667792.31234.dev@dpdk.org>
 <COL131-DS22A1D0FFBAE5E726E34810B7D20@phx.gbl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] About a zero copy framework
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:08:25 -0000

Hello,

10/12/2013 17:40, GongJinrong :
>       I am trying to develop an open source guest/host zero copy
> communication channel framework for kvm, I found DPDK has similar module,
> but it seems couples with intel NICs, how can I use DPDK to do the zero copy
> for kvm without intel NICs(host to guest or guest to guest)? I only need a
> data channel framework.

Have you seen virtio-net-pmd ?
	http://dpdk.org/browse/virtio-net-pmd
It could be close to what you want.

-- 
Thomas