From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
Chenbo Xia <chenbox@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: enhance virtqueue access lock asserts
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:52:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4668504.U7HbjWM52l@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231205094536.2816720-5-david.marchand@redhat.com>
05/12/2023 10:45, David Marchand:
> +#define VHOST_USER_ASSERT_LOCK(dev, vq, id) do { \
> + RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(!vhost_message_handlers[id].lock_all_qps); \
> + vq_assert_lock(dev, vq); \
> +} while (0)
Since "eal: enhance compile-time checks using C11 assert",
it is not allowed to have non-constant check in RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON:
lib/vhost/vhost_user.c:413:25: note: in expansion of macro 'VHOST_USER_ASSERT_LOCK'
lib/vhost/vhost_user.c: In function 'vhost_user_set_vring_addr':
lib/eal/include/rte_common.h:518:56: error: expression in static assertion is not constant
#define RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) do { static_assert(!(condition), #condition); } while (0)
I suppose we can make this check at compile-time with few adjustments.
For -rc1, I am dropping this patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-23 9:55 [PATCH 1/3] vhost: robustify " David Marchand
2023-10-23 9:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] vhost: fix virtqueue access lock in datapath David Marchand
2023-10-27 9:03 ` Eelco Chaudron
2023-10-27 9:22 ` David Marchand
2023-10-27 10:11 ` Eelco Chaudron
2023-12-05 9:10 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-10-23 9:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] vhost: annotate virtqueue access checks David Marchand
2023-10-27 9:04 ` Eelco Chaudron
2023-10-27 8:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] vhost: robustify virtqueue access lock asserts Eelco Chaudron
2023-12-05 9:02 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-12-05 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] vhost: fix virtqueue access check in datapath David Marchand
2023-12-05 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] vhost: fix virtqueue access check in VDUSE setup David Marchand
2023-12-05 9:57 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-12-05 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] vhost: fix virtqueue access check in vhost-user setup David Marchand
2023-12-05 9:59 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-12-05 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] vhost: annotate virtqueue access checks David Marchand
2023-12-05 11:04 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-12-05 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: enhance virtqueue access lock asserts David Marchand
2024-02-19 10:52 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2024-02-26 15:46 ` David Marchand
2024-02-26 17:05 ` [PATCH v3] " David Marchand
2024-02-26 19:40 ` Maxime Coquelin
2024-02-26 20:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-02-27 10:39 ` [PATCH v4] " David Marchand
2024-03-01 15:22 ` Maxime Coquelin
2024-03-05 9:04 ` David Marchand
2023-12-12 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] vhost: fix virtqueue access check in datapath Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4668504.U7HbjWM52l@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=chenbox@nvidia.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).