From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2D1A0547; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:08:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FDD40041; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:08:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427474003E for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:08:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1697580B0B; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 04:08:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Sep 2021 04:08:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= ZX8mQsCbhSbGsqhJy9Ac6Luidt4aT8dvAfbdTTN5J2E=; b=i2oAkW5lHX0WL87+ /GLWzWmZWuPHcvZR7yKDUeWETprtdhlINPpcjfdIm0i+fogr7+5pQFQ7KFaPWR3i Y/HJsREXbRoovwdyf7eEjU7Ot7G/wbCXED5cb0LUcDw4uyel3PxCYZsHc5fTWQzU bDE3Gt2mJ20DhKqnWfJ/b2EYiBMPKW5HI83wSUKvIkvoyYmLYQ6J8yN9M6tf4IxK Jm+lap/fHoyZhUbcgIeEd5oOK0p9KxPdKZMIePVygN0QM+cBoG8uKarnYRFL2SWF OYSLve3jd99S+U3zKIM4iYLu9hOHAqbXTYzotbkOp4TLy3XHuzTVLN6WIdYmIxld 0Ml8Sg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=ZX8mQsCbhSbGsqhJy9Ac6Luidt4aT8dvAfbdTTN5J 2E=; b=r/wujNEGGtFT/LP/N/b6gQVFvtnj8L0Zuiruo2yCIJZYPjR64QOw00gxG LioOFFMsoNbvMonRJ5kmYLlmewlcIJbKN1kxVjTeuw6395wgpo9kwRd6EOT0SWms Vsbn0if7IFoE2NA/HRbiloFfIjvY/bP4Lwqd2blB8kDU2kg2EvORaBGK2c/9Hw+4 Kb2Z68IzYFVQan+ptnZTg85cS4TEp2tSzR/zBkJFt1JQGjpuSmy2aqgY6oDg/tMN upj4P+eUGSk4bdRbZVZnSiDTlSyPlvjUedohQtKQIra9RYTr8E7sXXYqwp8NGqlv BxZZ7TvDIDoffvNKMCeN+mYK+KADw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudeflecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurf hrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfo ohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeekteehtdeivefhieegjeelgedufeejheekkeetueevieeuvdevuedtjeev heevteenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 04:08:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Juraj =?utf-8?B?TGlua2XFoQ==?= , Bruce Richardson Cc: Piotr Kubaj , David Christensen , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , "Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com" , "Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com" , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , "jerinjacobk@gmail.com" , "jerinj@marvell.com" , "stephen@networkplumber.org" , "dev@dpdk.org" Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 10:08:37 +0200 Message-ID: <4702963.fvyQDjA2YU@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <1624964105-6525-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> <2244c98874b14069bacc178516bb8e74@pantheon.tech> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] build: optional NUMA and cpu counts detection X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 09/09/2021 10:01, Bruce Richardson: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 07:20:27AM +0000, Juraj Linke=C5=A1 wrote: > > Piotr says lscpu isn't available on ppc FreeBSD. I think this leaves us= with two options: > > 1. either use sysctl with the risk that it may not return an accurate v= alue > > 2. not support PPC for numa detection > >=20 > > What do you think? >=20 > I think point #2 is more not supporting FreeBSD on PPC for numa detection > rather than not supporting PPC generally, right? Personally, I am just in > favour of #1 for the sake of moving forward and giving us best support wi= th > simplest code. If or when someone does hit this (FreeBSD+PPC) as a proble= m, > then we can work with them to find best solution for fixing it. Right now > we don't have anyone with the PPC+FreeBSD setup, so I'd rather ignore it > than implement more complicated solutions that we can't test "just in > case". +1, FreeBSD + PPC is not worth the complication