From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC494A0A05; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:53:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD57B140ECE; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:53:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BB0140ECE for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:53:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5310D5806AB; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 10:53:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 10:53:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= o9lk4TDi0Qwt44VMClu/9t+xxxzw3+SCnwTcngeEmjc=; b=ZHiMWqxUgib2q07j n4vwGdqdEMht/+AhhompA19cZKBhmqlLRn0lfY4nhzn3giofA3//guVFgsVxxBN4 Xuxk06wiE3ctdKef7akteymRGhfYTELZD2xyyNjzzqhe7enb92CqElAHBo33fR2N hG7mXt7JkZ+Tp0WP8FyC0GBAqtwZXW4mBiJaOXF+3wv+KtCmwAujnL+A7uVCrYm8 LKA22wX706qM9hIPzGZJzlubIY1NU2FUnn41N6tc/6NCbz6jDr1lPZIPBGQ/ym0Y g/qO0fjikSEsoh2+mGm5hhtfKs9hqwoydTkQPTnq9xxPgrRltf4fffEFKjh+6gQ6 uK/jTA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=o9lk4TDi0Qwt44VMClu/9t+xxxzw3+SCnwTcngeEm jc=; b=d+/XwnoQn9okqE3bvJi+wqf2/0th2ORnT8zH0x1SGqJfni/gxFot8Ct2s otIysWDwyyteZllh/3grXtUuDu4Xkou8woSZ6MVz1iwY94LPF2JYRRuIjkDLcwE2 +w4CMZk/Cz7lrCbKA7TxrtcGb7btWNH91K5FdUeBBRsREdGzCmQoW4Flci1qrLW5 QASra/tHT7j1Cxyseb+DxhqlroEcDmMF0V3yeGd5eHp5/vRQrEps8oKnGcmv42vu 5ReVGnGUWNn3G8uF1E4VLVjyBYVwR+KT6cM25mmJfUdnKV7uWKXXGnZWVNZhJeRb ZimUUx2KzC0xFVhKhF5WVdxwbB9MA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddtgdekvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeekteehtdeivefhieegjeelgedufeejheekkeetueevieeuvdevuedt jeevheevteenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EB9531080057; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 10:53:19 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Juraj =?utf-8?B?TGlua2XFoQ==?= Cc: "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , "Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com" , "Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com" , "Phil.Yang@arm.com" , "vcchunga@amazon.com" , "Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com" , "jerinjacobk@gmail.com" , "hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" , "ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com" , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , "aboyer@pensando.io" , "dev@dpdk.org" Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:53:18 +0100 Message-ID: <4718577.tG0Yr37hMW@thomas> In-Reply-To: <00836a65d15c4d1db615630ea0be340a@pantheon.tech> References: <1608724059-8562-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> <5559544.kKSZ1OeD4m@thomas> <00836a65d15c4d1db615630ea0be340a@pantheon.tech> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v15 00/12] Arm build options rework X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 19/01/2021 16:10, Juraj Linke=C5=A1: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > I consider these patches (9, 11, 12) need more review or rework: > >=20 > > > build: disable drivers in Arm builds > > > build: add Arm SoC meson option > > > config: fix Arm implementer and its SoCs > >=20 > > I've decided to partially apply the series to have progress in 21.02-rc= 1. > > Please let's continue with these three patches during -rc2. >=20 > Should I submit new version as continuation of this series or should thes= e three patches constitute a new series? Continuing the series may help tracking the history.