From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72058A00C2; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 19:47:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430141C19A; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 19:47:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70161BF8E for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 19:47:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A3FFBA; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:47:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:47:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= 67jb6opJpVInN2FLGhggEq+6md3eiZz6Fetj84NG0Fs=; b=oUEElN+0j4BD4ThR DEF6cE6KuH+F9xjsah7iq7IrSK/zDVb4EYX7M3WcYqpdsSk40z4VrXNazFR92hHN eInwyy3mO+zAINHz1mhYCIqGchF2IfzpEqziZIvnIkXSEtbLtdQ1D0FLP9FVlbbI fxgqMJHuPVA3uAmHfpTR5aPmlrT4UhtBjhtaGhm+BOqVVBjtBPxOfM+TN6aACCFW ceVPDA774CNoZ/CL5UstdgOofaP3+WKNDajAOCEYRDvHVgSZMqs/FjWWuI0faGnK vc0Ml+IQQFnMktVy5rPyX27oPDJamu8u4ahdWH4nWleKL0PrD9K+XnRD4+P3BJUh G2vr/g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=67jb6opJpVInN2FLGhggEq+6md3eiZz6Fetj84NG0 Fs=; b=nOGjw58Vp+9RyGv0drZE9dIEylzw5ndBKzaVH9wMTouwmybXPb8U1lBuu ru1UCAJsd3rt/ZBNluhp9ijN6uV83tzSWVyNS/FBohsktx0c4Zn5hRdPiYMTReT0 jFOw6F7h4tgO2leut0itfLXLykj3Lq2G6YPK3nKIdnUhTiHXVZn9pyFWfGdsfDQX qutLUkmceoWgm+TAaPWXiIWA+W8ES0Jg3eQgGMHZE1DxR2fcDtg+TOMn5zcc1D9p hR/WtPxivFs5dAEfXzomgB3Zemw6Xwd6KWrC+VznkwVaaCsIgmgbAfUvqd2KZKAj t2rvpbvw21TOvxwBcnDhGIQYQm/cw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrheeggdelgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E7A1D3065DF6; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:47:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Luca Boccassi Cc: Kevin Traynor , dev@dpdk.org Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 19:47:09 +0200 Message-ID: <4740923.upeRZZJTqa@thomas> In-Reply-To: <49933ebf7b872aefa7686fb227470200401e6ed5.camel@debian.org> References: <20200229163706.12741-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <83712900-431c-87e9-f9bd-5853ef796c21@redhat.com> <49933ebf7b872aefa7686fb227470200401e6ed5.camel@debian.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Fix various typos found by Lintian X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 04/03/2020 16:28, Luca Boccassi: > On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 14:34 +0000, Kevin Traynor wrote: > > On 29/02/2020 16:37, luca.boccassi@gmail.com wrote: > > > Debian's linter is getting more and more annoy^^smart and now > > > parses binaries > > > for typos too - CC stable to get it off my back in the next release > > > > Minor: Probably linter is better trained in the Queen's English than > > me > > or it could be personal preference, but 'one' seems to be referring > > to > > the user and it reads a bit strange for me. e.g. > > > > "Slave %d capabilities doesn't allow one to allocate additional > > queues" > > "hardware specifications that allow one to handle virtual memory" > > "Do not allow one to send packet if the maximum DMA.." > > > > as opposed to > > > > "Slave %d capabilities don't allow allocation of additional queues" > > "hardware specifications that allow handling of virtual memory" > > "Do not allow sending of a packet if the maximum DMA.." > > You might be right - but the intent here is not to be correct, it's to > get the linter to leave me alone :-) I agree with Kevin that the wording "allow one to make" is strange. Would lintian leave you alone with "allow making"? Anyway the "allow to" sentences are not typos. They could be reworded in a separate patch. Patch partly applied, except the "allow one to" changes, thanks.