From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D242A58 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 23:11:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3322B2087B; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:11:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 Jul 2017 17:11:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=sSvK1C1RaVgkjvY rLn0uoB6pCOCQOzRe/kd9JKigCq8=; b=DlVEh6jwJMZEUum2QDqTDidnsjoneNr 7wTMu1e4tecsHURU8BgNFy/QRRntfP4YRHmSsELQFLl3ltoByDIQpW10J5bG/xJS hTYIwWcznCMQkumzTnm/IIqJxGem8ca/QyGB7FUfpVhA0VpHscYAe0biTlzoQp32 jk6EYvuIQnAc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=sSvK1C1RaVgkjvYrLn0uoB6pCOCQOzRe/kd9JKigCq8=; b=BfHP92U0 +KayqABjrFmAwzF5bOndC1MeMhvuJum5SPtcrKH5BarOh6xjDygcuoporqsEGEcE C8RMLR84fOABvLfeCY6xbhlaJdQ9cF02EPLtdpDwKlZUFnuMnEey3FE/LJamODba O7hdyDpumuR2SyPySqRj4p5qzgj37nzHbw9vOQXlhNSb0pV2+IFfTByzzsNHBZBZ 3kRGr7FGc76OplV6AKyPjKY24zvO8dzP7z9RA8aQxCq4zK0uJgCUAC1FOPuXRiny EjuVfzZ9tFGSzo7g0+Z5wrk/pYLVB8dDTieXC9zYh3n5+nQTLWaGadvS0XI6uVPJ IXMpqCT1ZDXgOQ== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 7H3SHZU2Gx25D77zb7Dcpw/FmivaZYv4MqzNgCkppZCu 1499116294 Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D7D817E429; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:11:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jianbo Liu , cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, ashwin.sekhar@caviumnetworks.com Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 23:11:34 +0200 Message-ID: <4804120.hkK0KHU9aJ@xps> In-Reply-To: <1495098540-8303-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> References: <1495098540-8303-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/ip_pipeline: use crc32 in hash functions for arm64 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 21:11:35 -0000 18/05/2017 11:09, Jianbo Liu: > Implement the same hash functions with crc32 on arm platform. > > Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu > --- > examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/hash_func.h | 2 + > examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/hash_func_arm64.h | 245 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 247 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/hash_func_arm64.h I don't understand why this code is in an example. We have some CRC code in librte_hash, librte_net and ip_pipeline. Cristian, Jianbo, does it make sense to move these functions somewhere else?