From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E5A5A6B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  2 Nov 2015 08:31:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wmff134 with SMTP id f134so52556697wmf.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 23:31:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent
 :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding
 :content-type; bh=y/peVvP4zx5rP6E75g8Xb/QAhKA5kVrpNyl0k+RvtCs=;
 b=pjAblxKSmIwa858uHirQCgr226bu/Z6nyCQW9CA21Hv8FyYRiomIHU58zpcbdJ7KwE
 TB7xKo9N/kO05wD0nSsSqRr7H/OaVg1LEUcJIYATPNQ4GSURGA8Hjd8MaJCzBckVxKSG
 Fz2MQ9QIoUOnvqtqSF5ea4GS9Ugb8jOfblDwSyy7HGujzSvIXPs5np0fwYtyOWO6sedy
 Mk4F3270ZlBKP/RvkqLVDXWHSb0hqDeroNDsgZGZM3/SgxfePcg1G8LUngK9PxHmF5Jq
 a/mze7ZMfAq394w9lBIY+w+SG7B5CLiTz3exupNPT1RUzi9TJQ64Kz2/TH/DG4FcNn1P
 QrOg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=y/peVvP4zx5rP6E75g8Xb/QAhKA5kVrpNyl0k+RvtCs=;
 b=QdvXvYnztlDblnaCic3LNDCkMelCQcCphPFN4Uu4SeZWLR3gRryeanv0eh7Lvxn7dm
 Mn0/qUdrcDmGzFwuvPq1Old4wvIBJ+bt9gtlkhX1WkevBFyYV0HWWvZWQ5+32udq5Xkm
 ryHYjxSCNhlBZ36sT7EJAsTCmx/xUxrjO4cPHLWv6ZxQORocHSRcZYAVVz17kRgO+D+T
 Jy+o/1v5mX1L9bX5TGEUhQJgCGT4nQS7xJaS7x8xfPuv5k4cZ9s6ZqnNznfpOQlQ7GXZ
 M79aordr24oILUL0qlJx4PIejcj8C30gCdryxKk7qbaXEZw0/39WJyQkpwDaPMRqCPvQ
 STlg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmDeSOnnJqHixsSPw39MURLxmrq1+oYlZsngTjKqh2rFTohvpXEceNF5zvi5btQdPfDlxNr
X-Received: by 10.28.16.1 with SMTP id 1mr10984610wmq.57.1446449499307;
 Sun, 01 Nov 2015 23:31:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xps13.localnet (158.20.90.92.rev.sfr.net. [92.90.20.158])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l1sm16479817wmg.21.2015.11.01.23.31.38
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sun, 01 Nov 2015 23:31:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:10:25 +0100
Message-ID: <4832819.EtRlJavyLu@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20151102000517.GA4669@sivlogin002.ir.intel.com>
References: <1706989.WgznurFLZ8@xps13> <4489406.qekDmzhmkY@xps13>
 <20151102000517.GA4669@sivlogin002.ir.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Eric Kinzie <ekinzie@brocade.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: fix ABI versioning compile error for
	combined shared library
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 07:31:39 -0000

2015-11-02 00:05, Ferruh Yigit:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:24:51AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >  ifeq ($(LINK_USING_CC),1)
> > >  # Override the definition of LD here, since we're linking with CC
> > >  LD := $(CC) $(CPU_CFLAGS)
> > > -O_TO_S = $(LD) $(call linkerprefix,$(CPU_LDFLAGS)) \
> > > +O_TO_S = $(LD) $(call linkerprefix,$(SHARED_LDFLAGS)) \
> > >  	-shared $(OBJS) -o $(RTE_OUTPUT)/lib/$(LIB_ONE)
> > >  else
> > > -O_TO_S = $(LD) $(CPU_LDFLAGS) \
> > > +O_TO_S = $(LD) $(SHARED_LDFLAGS) \
> > >  	-shared $(OBJS) -o $(RTE_OUTPUT)/lib/$(LIB_ONE)
> > >  endif
> > 
> > Why do you remove CPU_LDFLAGS?
> 
> CPU_LDFLAGS shared by other libraries and confilicts with this usage.

Sorry I don't understand.
CPU_LDFLAGS is -melf_i386 for Intel 32-bit.
Why removing it for combined library? What is the conflict?