From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E31C89C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:05:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wguu7 with SMTP id u7so89475656wgu.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=m6N01Np4tRSgB+IjJ0NBAZ/Up0ymi+igaU5CodmTYf0=;
 b=KHspccyX/TrWbfsgrv5BUW9cFMNVL4vrb+k7m1768pCGvBppNfp/sCpqUv07g+FiEo
 ooHY3EUT5at41BIjPzyfkN6c06RyVSFGOltYvWVUHwX6O1zDJH4Y+TLqxelqfy9tC57z
 uKE02FTT3i0rVg7DwytqhHKDZzQON7xP61nd7EfHS5M99yFVPvIKfOSE4jvYsb7zxbJO
 iawO+d+rRLnoTslbIBXAmVUf2zX4B2IV4ncW0BZt70dTNrq+vgclXN6fUqfR+hHK4TUz
 URKZzfKS9togdtMs1N7ZEhi+Z7ILw5ZkMdOXTW9aHsVcF7pQhNIRoML7EkRYEtZb44qT
 U/iw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkl53yNYlobMsiWl44iqBwcDs44HlXGlFDCzDx5Y0g6hpoz3g4HH3mtUiZOysW+fwCxe09q
X-Received: by 10.180.88.201 with SMTP id bi9mr5255212wib.58.1435327510906;
 Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y19sm2387245wia.15.2015.06.26.07.05.08
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov@linaro.org>, "Mcnamara,
 John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>, "tero.aho@coriant.com" <tero.aho@coriant.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:04:03 +0200
Message-ID: <4834004.3WCpfd7CLu@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <5576E12F.4030200@linaro.org>
References: <1433844923-29797-1-git-send-email-maxim.uvarov@linaro.org>
 <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2F34927@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <5576E12F.4030200@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischofer@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] support jumbo frames for pcap vdev
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:05:11 -0000

2015-06-09 15:50, Maxim Uvarov:
> On 06/09/15 15:15, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Maxim Uvarov
> >> PCAP PMD vdev is used mostly for testing. Increase snapshot len parameter
> >> provided to pcap_open_live() to accept packet more then 4096 (support
> >> jumbo frames for pcap pmd).
> >
> > There is already an existing patch for jumbo frame support in the PCAP pmd.
> >
> >      http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/3792/
> >
> > Could you review/try that and see if it is suitable for your purposes.
> 
> Thanks, I did not see that patch. I see that your patch supports 
> segmentation also. Will do test in my environment.

Any update?