* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH dpdk v2] vfio/ppc64/spapr: Use correct structures for add/remove windows
@ 2017-04-26 8:06 Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-04-26 8:15 ` Burakov, Anatoly
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2017-04-26 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy
If Linux UAPI headers in the system do not have VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_v2_IOMMU
defined, DPDK define necessary structures itself. However the existing
definitions are different from ones pushed to the mainline kernel.
This copies structures passed via VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE_CREATE and
VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE_REMOVE ioctls.
No change in behaviour is expected if installed linux UAPI headers
have knowledge of VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_v2_IOMMU.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
Changes:
v2:
* changed commit log after I realized that the linux UAPI headers are
currently used and if a distro is quite fresh, it has everything
defined correctly
---
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.h | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.h b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.h
index 239ac4d8d..4a0283cb4 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.h
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.h
@@ -69,13 +69,21 @@ struct vfio_iommu_spapr_register_memory {
struct vfio_iommu_spapr_tce_create {
uint32_t argsz;
+ uint32_t flags;
+ /* in */
uint32_t page_shift;
+ uint32_t __resv1;
uint64_t window_size;
uint32_t levels;
+ uint32_t __resv2;
+ /* out */
+ uint64_t start_addr;
};
struct vfio_iommu_spapr_tce_remove {
uint32_t argsz;
+ uint32_t flags;
+ /* in */
uint64_t start_addr;
};
--
2.11.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH dpdk v2] vfio/ppc64/spapr: Use correct structures for add/remove windows
2017-04-26 8:06 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH dpdk v2] vfio/ppc64/spapr: Use correct structures for add/remove windows Alexey Kardashevskiy
@ 2017-04-26 8:15 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2017-04-30 17:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Burakov, Anatoly @ 2017-04-26 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy, dev
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Alexey
> Kardashevskiy
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:07 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH dpdk v2] vfio/ppc64/spapr: Use correct
> structures for add/remove windows
>
> If Linux UAPI headers in the system do not have
> VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_v2_IOMMU defined, DPDK define necessary structures
> itself. However the existing definitions are different from ones pushed to
> the mainline kernel.
>
> This copies structures passed via VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE_CREATE and
> VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE_REMOVE ioctls.
>
> No change in behaviour is expected if installed linux UAPI headers have
> knowledge of VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_v2_IOMMU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> ---
> Changes:
> v2:
> * changed commit log after I realized that the linux UAPI headers are
> currently used and if a distro is quite fresh, it has everything defined correctly
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.h | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.h
> b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.h
> index 239ac4d8d..4a0283cb4 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.h
> @@ -69,13 +69,21 @@ struct vfio_iommu_spapr_register_memory {
>
> struct vfio_iommu_spapr_tce_create {
> uint32_t argsz;
> + uint32_t flags;
> + /* in */
> uint32_t page_shift;
> + uint32_t __resv1;
> uint64_t window_size;
> uint32_t levels;
> + uint32_t __resv2;
> + /* out */
> + uint64_t start_addr;
> };
>
> struct vfio_iommu_spapr_tce_remove {
> uint32_t argsz;
> + uint32_t flags;
> + /* in */
> uint64_t start_addr;
> };
>
> --
> 2.11.0
That was quite an oversight on my part!..
Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH dpdk v2] vfio/ppc64/spapr: Use correct structures for add/remove windows
2017-04-26 8:15 ` Burakov, Anatoly
@ 2017-04-30 17:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2017-04-30 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy; +Cc: dev, Burakov, Anatoly
26/04/2017 10:15, Burakov, Anatoly:
> >
> > If Linux UAPI headers in the system do not have
> > VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_v2_IOMMU defined, DPDK define necessary structures
> > itself. However the existing definitions are different from ones pushed to
> > the mainline kernel.
> >
> > This copies structures passed via VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE_CREATE and
> > VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE_REMOVE ioctls.
> >
> > No change in behaviour is expected if installed linux UAPI headers have
> > knowledge of VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_v2_IOMMU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>
> That was quite an oversight on my part!..
>
> Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Applied, thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-30 17:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-26 8:06 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH dpdk v2] vfio/ppc64/spapr: Use correct structures for add/remove windows Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-04-26 8:15 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2017-04-30 17:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).