From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1847282
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 19:41:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lfbn-1-8274-170.w81-254.abo.wanadoo.fr ([81.254.171.170]
 helo=[192.168.1.13])
 by mail.droids-corp.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <olivier.matz@6wind.com>)
 id 1bMImE-0001vf-Tm; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 19:44:23 +0200
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
References: <1467893942-4048-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
 <20160708204212.GA34980@bricha3-MOBL3>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, helin.zhang@intel.com,
 Maxime Leroy <maxime.leroy@6wind.com>
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <48d2321f-df44-3f60-1095-52866e2845fc@6wind.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 19:41:45 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Icedove/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160708204212.GA34980@bricha3-MOBL3>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: support checksum flags in sse vector
	Rx function
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:41:53 -0000

Hi Bruce,

On 07/08/2016 10:42 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:19:02PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
>> Update desc_to_olflags_v() to set PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD and
>> PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD in the ol_fags of the mbuf.
>>
{...}
> 
> Given this looks a significant change to a complicated piece of code, which is
> also very performance sensitive, I believe this change needs to be deferred to
> 16.11 release, as there is not enough time to properly review and test it for
> 16.07.


Sure, that was the plan, I forgot to mention it :)

Thanks,
Olivier