From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F7C234 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 11:17:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 May 2017 02:17:45 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,344,1491289200"; d="scan'208";a="87504384" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.81]) ([10.237.220.81]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 May 2017 02:17:44 -0700 To: Yuanhan Liu Cc: dev@dpdk.org References: <20170512103303.93161-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <493e9af9-a800-4642-e40f-ab15e234d7ad@intel.com> Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 10:17:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170512103303.93161-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] driver/net: remove unnecessary macro for unused variables X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 09:17:46 -0000 On 5/12/2017 11:33 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > remove __rte_unused instances that are not required. > Hi Yuanhan, Does this kind of refactoring patches, specially the ones covering multiple drivers, cause trouble (more conflicts) to you while getting patches for stable trees? If so, I can postpone them through the end of integration deadline. But postponing them most probably will mean rebasing these patches later, so if this is not causing any problem for you, please let me know so that I can get them earlier. Thanks, ferruh