From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23468A0547; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:11:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF63040142; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:11:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B84B4003E; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:11:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE46F5C01E0; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:11:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:11:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= RM5AGmBY85Sw/cBOWNhbHG3QWGyxOs8F8wdc9L+q5AY=; b=M/1e3/c2vk+UvBIG AEf956g02ilDypKIMxhggAfPIED5TeETYLWAPkgurXe838XqtxzzSqV00kf2CpAV 0WpOGdVN64sgxwkccl6qqDD8NdGVx36UYv7IrTOPSP/V56KX633Cb7R/ysD6fD6q snF/LyJ0KJL51UZGOpXNNqLqaQoImNXRYJwigVc3G/KmrKL42IXSjUMaIzrYMMFK pj65Q9uKL6CQx9H+zWXVP1IBEeB8u3e/zsV1CiVrjqLRWPnk2/TF7ZiVxQZ2iLo2 UQKmp34NZge7mAOPHhw9ZIzZWI660vPPov3TUHRtXmmOBQp3A7jQm1W5FwBs54Uq YflhCQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=RM5AGmBY85Sw/cBOWNhbHG3QWGyxOs8F8wdc9L+q5 AY=; b=ntHw+dWfCv5mCbPEyMocdln4oQ851Gu0aI95TEjrZT7r2o846GVzppra9 dHxiPGD2o2+HojPwIHh0kvce59V/tbrtRJK5jD5pGTh4BNa9CNPx8zEqi07nGQU9 vcbmsEXKzDAJXDdAzCjZZBdNCNTJzmrO3bQ5/vE3ttGF98e9P8Cs8gA1iPiTgP9X ZksulxZJpb5bE2SKqfScmJr9U6AEkDOy7egVxL/lfucOzfZPkc+kQ99aAqrHpd9z 7g4aK3df9htaTN7CC3lM4WA/JHvqd9jYqlEasI+hIdcw8XtpNUvyVHaDvIGANxga chXCnjgii/ZIYxYgeiGdVid1SOdrw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddvvddguddukecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvkeetveeihfegfedtfeejueekkeekueevgfejuedviedvvdev uefgteevtdefveenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:11:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jerin Jacob Cc: Elena Agostini , "techboard@dpdk.org" , dpdk-dev Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:11:51 +0200 Message-ID: <49537708.gDWMe1fELP@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210602203531.2288645-1-thomas@monjalon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/9] GPU library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 19/10/2021 20:47, Jerin Jacob: > > As I stated multiple times, let=E2=80=99s start with something simple t= hat works and > > then think about how to enhance the library/driver. >=20 > I have submitted RFC[1] to abstract in a generic way so that > workload-specific _driver_ aspects are NOT EXPOSED to the application. >=20 > The RFC explains with application code, how any workload can be used > by the application without exposing the driver details. > Also, shows how to enable a framework to abstract a different form of > workload acceletor(DPU, GPU, XPU, IPU....) >=20 > In order to map to this discussion with RFC: > You may need to add a new host port for GPU which as > lib/dwa/rte_dwa_port_host_xxxxx.h and adding new workload as > lib/dwa/rte_dwa_profile_xxxx.h(Which can be reused by > all dataplane workload accelerator) >=20 > [1] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-October/226070.html That's really 2 different points of view: - expose only some predefined dataplane workloads - or allow to build any custom worload