DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dai, Wei" <wei.dai@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] ethdev: new Rx/Tx offloads API
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 11:27:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49759EB36A64CF4892C1AFEC9231E8D66CF7FE9F@PGSMSX111.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7647125.8C0XxgkuRT@xps>

Hi, Thomas
Thanks for your feedback and guidance.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 10:36 AM
> To: Dai, Wei <wei.dai@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] ethdev: new Rx/Tx offloads API
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am checking if this patch comply with goals discussed in the survey:
> 	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-March/094459.html
> 
> - Allow "forgetting" port offloads in queue offloads setup.
> 
> - An offload enabled at port level, cannot be disabled at queue level.
> 
> - Every queue capabilities must be reported as port capabilities.
> 
> - A capability should be reported at queue level
>   only if it can be enabled on queue when it is disabled on port level.
> 
> I think some items must be updated in doxygen comments of rte_ethdev.h.
> Please could you try to do a v11 for doxygen? I will review it quickly.
> 
> Examples:
> 
> 	- in queue offloads:
> 		"No need to repeat flags already enabled at port level.
> 		 A flag enabled at port level, cannot be disabled at queue level."
> 
> 	- in port capabilities: "(include per-queue capabilities)"
> 
> More comments below, thanks.
> 
> 
> 10/05/2018 02:56, Wei Dai:
> > This patch check if a input requested offloading is valid or not.
> > Any reuqested offloading must be supported in the device capabilities.
> > Any offloading is disabled by default if it is not set in the
> > parameter dev_conf->[rt]xmode.offloads to rte_eth_dev_configure( ) and
> > [rt]x_conf->offloads to rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
> > If any offloading is enabled in rte_eth_dev_configure( ) by
> > application, it is enabled on all queues no matter whether it is
> > per-queue or per-port type and no matter whether it is set or cleared
> > in [rt]x_conf->offloads to rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
> > If a per-queue offloading hasn't be enabled in rte_eth_dev_configure(
> > ), it can be enabled or disabled for individual queue in
> > ret_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
> > A new added offloading is the one which hasn't been enabled in
> > rte_eth_dev_configure( ) and is reuqested to be enabled in
> > rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ), it must be per-queue type, otherwise
> > triger an error log.
> > The underlying PMD must be aware that the requested offloadings to PMD
> > specific queue_setup( ) function only carries those new added
> > offloadings of per-queue type.
> 
> Good summary.
> Please forget the whitespace inside the parens.
I will remove whitespaces inside the parens.
> 
> > This patch can make above such checking in a common way in rte_ethdev
> > layer to avoid same checking in underlying PMD.
> 
> Good
> 
> > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.rst
> > @@ -297,16 +297,30 @@ Per-Port and Per-Queue Offloads
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> >  In the DPDK offload API, offloads are divided into per-port and per-queue
> offloads.
> > +A per-queue offloading can be enabled on a queue and disabled on
> another queue at the same time.
> > +A pure per-port offloading can't be enabled on a queue and disabled on
> another queue at the same time.
> > +A pure per-port offloading must be enabled or disabled on all queues at
> the same time.
> > +A per-port offloading can be enabled or disabled on all queues at the
> same time.
> 
> What is the difference between pure per-port and per-port here?
> 
Can I add following words to explain more: 
A pure per-port offloads are those supported by device but not per-queue type.
A supported offload can be per-queue or pure per-port,  but can't be both
types at same device. 
Any offloadings are per-port type as it can be enabled or disabled on all queues
at the same time.

> > +It is certain that both per-queue and pure per-port offloading are per-port
> type.
> 
> I don't understand this sentence.
> 
Explained above, I just want to divide all offloading into two distinct types: 
Per-queue and pure per-port.
And per-queue + pure per-port = per-port.


> >  The different offloads capabilities can be queried using
> ``rte_eth_dev_info_get()``.
> > +The dev_info->[rt]x_queue_offload_capa returned from
> ``rte_eth_dev_info_get()`` includes all per-queue offloading capabilities.
> > +The dev_info->[rt]x_offload_capa returned from
> ``rte_eth_dev_info_get()`` includes all per-port and per-queue offloading
> capabilities.
> 
> Yes
> 
> > +Any requested offloading by application must be within the device
> capabilities.
> 
> Yes
> 
> > +Any offloading is disabled by default if it is not set in the
> > +parameter
> 
> Yes
> 
> > +dev_conf->[rt]xmode.offloads to ``rte_eth_dev_configure( )`` and
> > +[rt]x_conf->offloads to ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )``.
> > +If any offloading is enabled in ``rte_eth_dev_configure( )`` by
> > +application, it is enabled on all queues no matter whether it is
> > +per-queue or per-port type and no matter whether it is set or cleared
> > +in [rt]x_conf->offloads to ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )``.
> > +If a per-queue offloading hasn't been enabled in
> > +``rte_eth_dev_configure( )``, it can be enabled or disabled in
> ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )`` for individual queue.
> 
> Yes
> 
> > +A new added offloads in [rt]x_conf->offloads to
> > +``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )`` input by application is the one
> > +which hasn't been enabled in ``rte_eth_dev_configure( )`` and is requested
> to be enabled in ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )``, it must be per-queue type,
> otherwise return error.
> 
> Yes
> 
> 
> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_05.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_05.rst
> > +* **ethdev: changes to offload API**
> 
> No need of bold formatting of title in API changes.
> 
Will revise it as you guide.

> > +
> > +   A pure per-port offloading isn't requested to be repeated in
> [rt]x_conf->offloads to
> > +   ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )``. Now any offloading enabled in
> ``rte_eth_dev_configure( )``
> > +   can't be disabled by ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )``. Any new added
> offloading which has
> > +   not been enabled in ``rte_eth_dev_configure( )`` and is requested to
> be enabled in
> > +   ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )`` must be per-queue type, otherwise
> return error.
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-10 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-01 13:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: check consistency of per port offloads Wei Dai
2018-03-28  8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-04-13 17:31   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-15 10:37     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-16  3:06       ` Dai, Wei
2018-04-25 11:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:31   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:49     ` Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 17:04     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26  7:59       ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-04-26  8:18         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-26  8:51           ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-04-26 14:45             ` Dai, Wei
2018-04-26 14:37     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Wei Dai
2018-04-26 15:50       ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 15:56         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-26 15:59           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 16:11         ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-03  1:30       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Wei Dai
2018-05-04 11:12         ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-04 14:02         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Wei Dai
2018-05-04 14:42           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-04 14:45             ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-05 18:59           ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-05-07  7:15             ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-08 10:58             ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 10:05           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] " Wei Dai
2018-05-08 10:41             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 11:02               ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 11:22                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 11:37             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 12:34               ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-08 12:12             ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-09 12:45               ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10  0:49             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9] ethdev: new Rx/Tx offloads API Wei Dai
2018-05-10  0:56               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10  1:28                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10  2:35                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-10 11:27                   ` Dai, Wei [this message]
2018-05-10  9:25                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-10 19:47                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 11:30                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 11:56                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 21:39                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14  8:37                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 11:19                         ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10 21:48                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-14 12:00                     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v13] " Wei Dai
2018-05-14 12:54                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 13:26                         ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-14 13:20                       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14] " Wei Dai
2018-05-14 14:11                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 14:46                           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 21:08                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 10:10           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-05-08 17:51             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-09  2:10               ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-09 14:11               ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-09 22:40                 ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49759EB36A64CF4892C1AFEC9231E8D66CF7FE9F@PGSMSX111.gar.corp.intel.com \
    --to=wei.dai@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).