From: "Dai, Wei" <wei.dai@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v13] ethdev: new Rx/Tx offloads API
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 13:26:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49759EB36A64CF4892C1AFEC9231E8D66CF81CC9@PGSMSX111.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3929007.eCSRkoNXUr@xps>
Hi, Thomas
Thanks for your quick feedback.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 8:54 PM
> To: Dai, Wei <wei.dai@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v13] ethdev: new Rx/Tx offloads API
>
> 14/05/2018 14:00, Wei Dai:
> > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.rst
> > @@ -303,12 +303,12 @@ In the DPDK offload API, offloads are divided
> > into per-port and per-queue offloa
> > * A pure per-port offloading can't be enabled on a queue and disabled on
> another queue at the same time.
> > * A pure per-port offloading must be enabled or disabled on all queues at
> the same time.
> > * Any offloading is per-queue or pure per-port type, but can't be both
> types at same devices.
> > -* A per-port offloading can be enabled or disabled on all queues at the
> same time.
> > -* It is certain that both per-queue and pure per-port offloading are
> per-port type.
> > +* Port capabilities = pre-queue capabilities + pure per-port capabilities.
>
> s/pre/per/
Sorry for the typo error.
>
> > +* Any supported offloading can be enabled on all queues.
> >
> > The different offloads capabilities can be queried using
> ``rte_eth_dev_info_get()``.
> > The ``dev_info->[rt]x_queue_offload_capa`` returned from
> ``rte_eth_dev_info_get()`` includes all per-queue offloading capabilities.
> > -The ``dev_info->[rt]x_offload_capa`` returned from
> ``rte_eth_dev_info_get()`` includes all per-port and per-queue offloading
> capabilities.
> > +The ``dev_info->[rt]x_offload_capa`` returned from
> ``rte_eth_dev_info_get()`` includes all pure per-port and per-queue
> offloading capabilities.
>
> OK
>
>
> > @@ -1556,29 +1558,29 @@ rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id,
> uint16_t rx_queue_id,
> > * The local_conf.offloads input to underlying PMD only carries
> > * those offloadings which are only enabled on this queue and
> > * not enabled on all queues.
> > - * The underlying PMD must be aware of this point.
> > */
>
> OK
>
>
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > @@ -1067,13 +1067,18 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_info {
> > uint16_t max_vfs; /**< Maximum number of VFs. */
> > uint16_t max_vmdq_pools; /**< Maximum number of VMDq pools. */
> > uint64_t rx_offload_capa;
> > - /**< All RX offload capabilities including all per queue ones */
> > + /**<
> > + * All RX offload capabilities including all per-queue ones.
> > + * Any flag in [rt]x_offload_capa and [rt]x_queue_offload_capa
> > + * of this structure needn't be repeated in rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup().
>
> It is confusing. Better to remove this sentence about queue_setup in port
> capa comment.
>
> > + * A flag enabled at port level can't be disabled at queue level.
>
> This one too: it is a comment about port capa, not queue setup.
>
Sorry, I think I have a mistake about your feedback on v12.
Will remove above 2 sentences.
>
> > @@ -1554,9 +1559,7 @@ const char * __rte_experimental
> rte_eth_dev_tx_offload_name(uint64_t offload);
> > * the [rt]x_offload_capa returned from
> rte_eth_dev_infos_get().
> > * Any type of device supported offloading set in the input
> argument
> > * eth_conf->[rt]xmode.offloads to rte_eth_dev_configure() is
> enabled
> > - * on all [RT]x queues and it can't be disabled no matter whether
> > - * it is cleared or set in the input argument [rt]x_conf->offloads
> > - * to rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup().
> > + * on all queues and it can't be disabled in
> rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup().
>
> OK
>
>
> Missing: we must explain the "no repeat need" and "no disable port offload
> on queue" constraint.
> In the last review, I was suggesting such sentences:
> No need to repeat flags already enabled at port level.
> A flag enabled at port level, cannot be disabled at queue level.
> I think it should go in queue setup comments.
>
> Opinion?
>
Will add this in the comments of queue_setup( ) in rte_ethdev.h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-14 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-01 13:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: check consistency of per port offloads Wei Dai
2018-03-28 8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-04-13 17:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-15 10:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-16 3:06 ` Dai, Wei
2018-04-25 11:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:49 ` Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 17:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 7:59 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-04-26 8:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-26 8:51 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-04-26 14:45 ` Dai, Wei
2018-04-26 14:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Wei Dai
2018-04-26 15:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 15:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-26 15:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 16:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-03 1:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Wei Dai
2018-05-04 11:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-04 14:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Wei Dai
2018-05-04 14:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-04 14:45 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-05 18:59 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-05-07 7:15 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-08 10:58 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 10:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] " Wei Dai
2018-05-08 10:41 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 11:02 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 11:22 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 11:37 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 12:34 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-08 12:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-09 12:45 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10 0:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9] ethdev: new Rx/Tx offloads API Wei Dai
2018-05-10 0:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 1:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 2:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-10 11:27 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10 9:25 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-10 19:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 11:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 11:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 21:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 8:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 11:19 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10 21:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-14 12:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v13] " Wei Dai
2018-05-14 12:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 13:26 ` Dai, Wei [this message]
2018-05-14 13:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14] " Wei Dai
2018-05-14 14:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 14:46 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 10:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-05-08 17:51 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-09 2:10 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-09 14:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-09 22:40 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49759EB36A64CF4892C1AFEC9231E8D66CF81CC9@PGSMSX111.gar.corp.intel.com \
--to=wei.dai@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).