DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dai, Wei" <wei.dai@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v13] ethdev: new Rx/Tx offloads API
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 13:26:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49759EB36A64CF4892C1AFEC9231E8D66CF81CC9@PGSMSX111.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3929007.eCSRkoNXUr@xps>

Hi, Thomas
Thanks for your quick feedback.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 8:54 PM
> To: Dai, Wei <wei.dai@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v13] ethdev: new Rx/Tx offloads API
> 
> 14/05/2018 14:00, Wei Dai:
> > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.rst
> > @@ -303,12 +303,12 @@ In the DPDK offload API, offloads are divided
> > into per-port and per-queue offloa
> >  * A pure per-port offloading can't be enabled on a queue and disabled on
> another queue at the same time.
> >  * A pure per-port offloading must be enabled or disabled on all queues at
> the same time.
> >  * Any offloading is per-queue or pure per-port type, but can't be both
> types at same devices.
> > -* A per-port offloading can be enabled or disabled on all queues at the
> same time.
> > -* It is certain that both per-queue and pure per-port offloading are
> per-port type.
> > +* Port capabilities = pre-queue capabilities + pure per-port capabilities.
> 
> s/pre/per/
Sorry for the typo error.

> 
> > +* Any supported offloading can be enabled on all queues.
> >
> >  The different offloads capabilities can be queried using
> ``rte_eth_dev_info_get()``.
> >  The ``dev_info->[rt]x_queue_offload_capa`` returned from
> ``rte_eth_dev_info_get()`` includes all per-queue offloading capabilities.
> > -The ``dev_info->[rt]x_offload_capa`` returned from
> ``rte_eth_dev_info_get()`` includes all per-port and per-queue offloading
> capabilities.
> > +The ``dev_info->[rt]x_offload_capa`` returned from
> ``rte_eth_dev_info_get()`` includes all pure per-port and per-queue
> offloading capabilities.
> 
> OK
> 
> 
> > @@ -1556,29 +1558,29 @@ rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id,
> uint16_t rx_queue_id,
> >  	 * The local_conf.offloads input to underlying PMD only carries
> >  	 * those offloadings which are only enabled on this queue and
> >  	 * not enabled on all queues.
> > -	 * The underlying PMD must be aware of this point.
> >  	 */
> 
> OK
> 
> 
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > @@ -1067,13 +1067,18 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_info {
> >  	uint16_t max_vfs; /**< Maximum number of VFs. */
> >  	uint16_t max_vmdq_pools; /**< Maximum number of VMDq pools. */
> >  	uint64_t rx_offload_capa;
> > -	/**< All RX offload capabilities including all per queue ones */
> > +	/**<
> > +	 * All RX offload capabilities including all per-queue ones.
> > +	 * Any flag in [rt]x_offload_capa and [rt]x_queue_offload_capa
> > +	 * of this structure needn't be repeated in rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup().
> 
> It is confusing. Better to remove this sentence about queue_setup in port
> capa comment.
> 
> > +	 * A flag enabled at port level can't be disabled at queue level.
> 
> This one too: it is a comment about port capa, not queue setup.
> 
Sorry, I think I have a mistake about your feedback on v12.
Will remove above 2 sentences.

> 
> > @@ -1554,9 +1559,7 @@ const char * __rte_experimental
> rte_eth_dev_tx_offload_name(uint64_t offload);
> >   *        the [rt]x_offload_capa returned from
> rte_eth_dev_infos_get().
> >   *        Any type of device supported offloading set in the input
> argument
> >   *        eth_conf->[rt]xmode.offloads to rte_eth_dev_configure() is
> enabled
> > - *        on all [RT]x queues and it can't be disabled no matter whether
> > - *        it is cleared or set in the input argument [rt]x_conf->offloads
> > - *        to rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup().
> > + *        on all queues and it can't be disabled in
> rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup().
> 
> OK
> 
> 
> Missing: we must explain the "no repeat need" and "no disable port offload
> on queue" constraint.
> In the last review, I was suggesting such sentences:
>         No need to repeat flags already enabled at port level.
>         A flag enabled at port level, cannot be disabled at queue level.
> I think it should go in queue setup comments.
> 
> Opinion?
> 
Will add this in the comments of queue_setup( ) in rte_ethdev.h

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-14 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-01 13:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: check consistency of per port offloads Wei Dai
2018-03-28  8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-04-13 17:31   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-15 10:37     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-16  3:06       ` Dai, Wei
2018-04-25 11:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:31   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:49     ` Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 17:04     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26  7:59       ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-04-26  8:18         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-26  8:51           ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-04-26 14:45             ` Dai, Wei
2018-04-26 14:37     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Wei Dai
2018-04-26 15:50       ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 15:56         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-26 15:59           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 16:11         ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-03  1:30       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Wei Dai
2018-05-04 11:12         ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-04 14:02         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Wei Dai
2018-05-04 14:42           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-04 14:45             ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-05 18:59           ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-05-07  7:15             ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-08 10:58             ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 10:05           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] " Wei Dai
2018-05-08 10:41             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 11:02               ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 11:22                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 11:37             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 12:34               ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-08 12:12             ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-09 12:45               ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10  0:49             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9] ethdev: new Rx/Tx offloads API Wei Dai
2018-05-10  0:56               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10  1:28                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10  2:35                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-10 11:27                   ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10  9:25                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-10 19:47                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 11:30                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 11:56                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 21:39                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14  8:37                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 11:19                         ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10 21:48                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-14 12:00                     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v13] " Wei Dai
2018-05-14 12:54                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 13:26                         ` Dai, Wei [this message]
2018-05-14 13:20                       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14] " Wei Dai
2018-05-14 14:11                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 14:46                           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 21:08                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 10:10           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-05-08 17:51             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-09  2:10               ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-09 14:11               ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-09 22:40                 ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49759EB36A64CF4892C1AFEC9231E8D66CF81CC9@PGSMSX111.gar.corp.intel.com \
    --to=wei.dai@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).