From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4F7FAE1 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 22:27:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c85so243672400wmi.1 for ; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:27:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=96fIJi6dv6k+Al114tMkNHB07GoyEPcjUPj8JGkUDdQ=; b=aQ8AwX1hS8GjjiCt6EGlOvCYdSBfDUcllNs52y74So1icbOj8BBRsNbbUuqspPtZQQ rb10u7AaXdutgUYYzHPNflODXNEC2HrIh/M/NoRaSNlzY6Lk+XYVr8XJ/yHYwJoRofW4 dAQh7f4Nw0FnZbNtGgt7SMesm2o13dHrlCpQS5R0SVlUfXo60LRLhyD5byokwphfXQDN 61udPZobCS+h8F/XeHJ8kiuS/BxSFaf/BRJCq8+3fV6T1POvjg4DB325I1Y3jr95maKv jOnsTQ++yBK1xPa3osGPM4NgmHFvwWlWy0+aiyeZUAdzDT/qwQjNJhjPxGPcbtlJXKGh PnHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=96fIJi6dv6k+Al114tMkNHB07GoyEPcjUPj8JGkUDdQ=; b=OyrmLdKr5Ov19fJsv+txAKRjFWDcXsgxUxCbAGaoCozYk8pFShGiMuZBGjLN5HlL7x hDFipVaP9AwG8javTDPzg5+RlJqSGywIO+28vzzLitsi0hTiM+yeJ7uddDLLHl4qKewp cQ1qLItM/OidiLcASVPEfXwpkfdBJXbAj9THOAl1kUfgR2Gab10c8B43AkDJPGHfNDh6 ri0O+YFs58am66hyvtN7nGVlv2xoUnxyB782WZpLkDXTs1tJUpQh8951ALvgDWw3hSzB m/nMCuI9ExM3zzzMbwJdqYI4C0+3qVialoQiiAAffY6dfFZsghEz66zFc33WC6lrSwTs E19g== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lRTXFKKpXGWjmR0wazpWzGKHT7BKRHqu7bNEKS5iZ4rRhBYVr6Zo3l/6JV6oHcwahr X-Received: by 10.28.232.90 with SMTP id f87mr22982373wmh.35.1486675625421; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:27:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k195sm438886wmd.7.2017.02.09.13.27.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:27:04 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Marvin Liu , Jianfeng Tan Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 22:27:03 +0100 Message-ID: <4997476.25NJoPJnWZ@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1486650334-34300-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com> References: <1485156509-4919-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com> <1486650334-34300-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] examples/ip_reassembly: add parse-ptype option X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 21:27:05 -0000 2017-02-09 22:25, Marvin Liu: > Add new option parse-ptype in this sample in case of pmd driver > not provide packet type info. If this option enabled, packet type > will be analyzed in Rx callback function. [...] > + if (parse_ptype) { > + if (add_cb_parse_ptype(portid, queueid) < 0) > + rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, > + "Fail to add ptype cb\n"); > + } else if (!check_ptype(portid)) > + rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, > + "PMD can not provide needed ptypes\n"); Instead of adding a new option, why not adding the callback automatically if the packet type is not supported by the hardware?