From: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/hns3: fix parse link fails code fail
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 21:20:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49e50599-342d-88d7-35dd-dc75ef018502@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74219925-5e0d-bb9a-3e81-46665ab01b33@intel.com>
On 2021/4/26 20:50, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/26/2021 1:41 PM, fengchengwen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2021/4/26 20:26, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>> On 4/22/2021 2:55 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>>>> From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
>>>>
>>>> The link fails code should be parsed using the structure
>>>> hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd, else it will parse fail.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 109e4dd1bd7a ("net/hns3: get link state change through mailbox")
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c | 5 +++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c
>>>> index ba04ac9..0550c9a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c
>>>> @@ -346,12 +346,13 @@ hns3_link_fail_parse(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint8_t link_fail_code)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static void
>>>> -hns3pf_handle_link_change_event(struct hns3_hw *hw,
>>>> - struct hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd *req)
>>>> +hns3pf_handle_link_change_event(struct hns3_hw *hw, void *data)
>>>
>>> Why not s/struct hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd/struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd/ but change
>>> to parameter to "void *", wouldn't it reduce the type check?
>>>
>>
>> Only this message needs to be converted using hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd.
>> All other messages are processed using hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd.
>> So here we simplifying fix it.
>>
>
> There is a single caller of the function, which send parameter as "struct
> hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd *req", so what is the point of making the parameter as
> "void *" and inside the function cast it to "struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd *req =
> data;"?
> Instead of defining parameter as "struct hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd *req".
>
We'll keep the original API interface and add comments in v2, thanks
>> Beside we will refactor hns3_mbx module in later version because the
>> PF and VF process logic is mixed.
>>
>
> OK
>
>> thanks
>>
>>>> {
>>>> #define LINK_STATUS_OFFSET 1
>>>> #define LINK_FAIL_CODE_OFFSET 2
>>>>
>>>> + struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd *req = data;
>>>> +
>>>> if (!req->msg[LINK_STATUS_OFFSET])
>>>> hns3_link_fail_parse(hw, req->msg[LINK_FAIL_CODE_OFFSET]);
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-26 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-22 1:55 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] bugfix for hns3 PMD Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-22 1:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/hns3: fix error mbx messages prompt errors Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-22 1:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/hns3: fix PF miss link status notify message Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-22 1:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/hns3: fix parse link fails code fail Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-26 12:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-26 12:41 ` fengchengwen
2021-04-26 12:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-26 13:20 ` fengchengwen [this message]
2021-04-26 13:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-27 11:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-27 12:31 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-27 12:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-27 12:45 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-27 13:03 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-27 13:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-27 13:43 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-27 15:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-22 1:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/hns3: delete unused macro and struct of mbx module Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-26 12:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] bugfix for hns3 PMD Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49e50599-342d-88d7-35dd-dc75ef018502@huawei.com \
--to=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=humin29@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).