From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E859A04B6; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 10:08:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8231DA07; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 10:08:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shelob.oktetlabs.ru (shelob.oktetlabs.ru [91.220.146.113]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4030D1D9F8 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 10:08:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.38.17] (aros.oktetlabs.ru [192.168.38.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by shelob.oktetlabs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB3B87F5D9; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:08:06 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 shelob.oktetlabs.ru BB3B87F5D9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=oktetlabs.ru; s=default; t=1602576486; bh=4/2gt+SEbBnrL5pt/Gc6aOrfubIqhMT2nT3pEj6AOBY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=LyNU+WF10ecEVACYt+W8do+XOVrBj5fB4SlsDtsFyp4k/dq8ZOaQbguXIcShMHne5 +KnDCvKZdbfm1UbgPgqdZ26mY1HKtAqgAC/mXf29MIAx/ohNgPVNj0JxCu7MLqgBY5 2tiJD9gheDpBU0kVxtGMhhXVyPx+wFyRNFXBqRWg= To: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" , dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com Cc: xavier.huwei@huawei.com References: <20201010071212.24086-1-huwei013@chinasoftinc.com> <20201013024126.26492-1-huwei013@chinasoftinc.com> From: Andrew Rybchenko Organization: OKTET Labs Message-ID: <4beba6fb-0ba4-74e3-b585-8056d5b30a93@oktetlabs.ru> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:08:06 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201013024126.26492-1-huwei013@chinasoftinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] ethdev: check if queue setup in queue-related APIs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/13/20 5:41 AM, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote: > From: Chengchang Tang > > This patch adds checking whether the related Tx or Rx queue has been setup "This patch adds checking" -> "Add checking" > in the queue-related API functions to avoid illegal address access. And > validity check of the queue_id is also added in the API functions > rte_eth_dev_rx_intr_enable and rte_eth_dev_rx_intr_disable. Thanks for the patch. LGTM with few minor notes. Based on the "And ..." in the description I'd consider to split it into two patches since it has few logical changes. * Addition of helper without extra check for queue setup in it. I.e. just code restructuring without any changes. Definitely harmless. * Additoin of queue setup check to helpers * Addition of queue ID checks to Rx interrupt control routines > > Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang > Signed-off-by: Wei Hu (Xavier) > Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng > Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger > --- > v3 -> v4: > 1. dropping the 'rte_' prefix from the funcitons names. > 2. get "struct rte_eth_dev *dev" as parameter and drop the port_id > validation in the function named eth_dev_validate_rx_queue and > eth_dev_validate_tx_queue. > 3. replace "setupped" with "setup" in the commit log and titile. > v2 -> v3: > don't break lines in format strings. > v1 -> v2: > 1. replace %"PRIu16" with %u. > 2. extact two common functions which validate RXQ/TXQ ids and > whether it has been set up or not. > --- > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 3 +- > 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c > index 892c246..04d30f9 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c > @@ -877,10 +877,53 @@ rte_eth_dev_rx_queue_config(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t nb_queues) > return 0; > } > > +static inline int Pleae, remove inline. The compiler should be wise enought to do the job. Also it is control path helpers, so there is no point to blow binaries size. > +eth_dev_validate_rx_queue(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t rx_queue_id) May be add 'const' to dev to highlight that it changes nothing. > +{ > + uint16_t port_id; > + > + if (rx_queue_id >= dev->data->nb_rx_queues) { > + RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "Invalid RX queue_id=%u\n", rx_queue_id); RX -> Rx Please, log port ID as well. I see that the log is simply copies from previous code, but let's improve it on the way. > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + if (dev->data->rx_queues[rx_queue_id] == NULL) { > + port_id = dev->data->port_id; > + RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, > + "Queue %u of device with port_id=%u has not been setup\n", > + rx_queue_id, port_id); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static inline int same as above > +eth_dev_validate_tx_queue(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t tx_queue_id) same as above > +{ > + uint16_t port_id; > + > + if (tx_queue_id >= dev->data->nb_tx_queues) { > + RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "Invalid TX queue_id=%u\n", tx_queue_id); TX -> Tx plus port_id logging > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + if (dev->data->tx_queues[tx_queue_id] == NULL) { > + port_id = dev->data->port_id; > + RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, > + "Queue %u of device with port_id=%u has not been setup\n", > + tx_queue_id, port_id); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > int > rte_eth_dev_rx_queue_start(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t rx_queue_id) > { > struct rte_eth_dev *dev; > + int ret; > > RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -EINVAL); > > @@ -892,10 +935,9 @@ rte_eth_dev_rx_queue_start(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t rx_queue_id) > return -EINVAL; > } > > - if (rx_queue_id >= dev->data->nb_rx_queues) { > - RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "Invalid RX queue_id=%u\n", rx_queue_id); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > + ret = eth_dev_validate_rx_queue(dev, rx_queue_id); > + if (ret) DPDK coding style requires explicit comparion to 0. Please, add != 0 > + return ret; > > RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->rx_queue_start, -ENOTSUP); > > @@ -922,14 +964,15 @@ int > rte_eth_dev_rx_queue_stop(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t rx_queue_id) > { > struct rte_eth_dev *dev; > + int ret; > > RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -EINVAL); > > dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id]; > - if (rx_queue_id >= dev->data->nb_rx_queues) { > - RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "Invalid RX queue_id=%u\n", rx_queue_id); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > + > + ret = eth_dev_validate_rx_queue(dev, rx_queue_id); > + if (ret) same as above, if (ret != 0) > + return ret; > > RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->rx_queue_stop, -ENOTSUP); > > @@ -955,6 +998,7 @@ int > rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_start(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t tx_queue_id) > { > struct rte_eth_dev *dev; > + int ret; > > RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -EINVAL); > > @@ -966,10 +1010,9 @@ rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_start(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t tx_queue_id) > return -EINVAL; > } > > - if (tx_queue_id >= dev->data->nb_tx_queues) { > - RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "Invalid TX queue_id=%u\n", tx_queue_id); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > + ret = eth_dev_validate_tx_queue(dev, tx_queue_id); > + if (ret) same as above, if (ret != 0) > + return ret; > > RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->tx_queue_start, -ENOTSUP); > > @@ -994,14 +1037,15 @@ int > rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_stop(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t tx_queue_id) > { > struct rte_eth_dev *dev; > + int ret; > > RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -EINVAL); > > dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id]; > - if (tx_queue_id >= dev->data->nb_tx_queues) { > - RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "Invalid TX queue_id=%u\n", tx_queue_id); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > + > + ret = eth_dev_validate_tx_queue(dev, tx_queue_id); > + if (ret) same as above, if (ret != 0) > + return ret; > > RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->tx_queue_stop, -ENOTSUP); > > @@ -4458,11 +4502,16 @@ rte_eth_dev_rx_intr_enable(uint16_t port_id, > uint16_t queue_id) > { > struct rte_eth_dev *dev; > + int ret; > > RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV); > > dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id]; > > + ret = eth_dev_validate_rx_queue(dev, queue_id); > + if (ret) same as above, if (ret != 0) > + return ret; > + > RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->rx_queue_intr_enable, -ENOTSUP); > return eth_err(port_id, (*dev->dev_ops->rx_queue_intr_enable)(dev, > queue_id)); > @@ -4473,11 +4522,16 @@ rte_eth_dev_rx_intr_disable(uint16_t port_id, > uint16_t queue_id) > { > struct rte_eth_dev *dev; > + int ret; > > RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV); > > dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id]; > > + ret = eth_dev_validate_rx_queue(dev, queue_id); > + if (ret) same as above, if (ret != 0) > + return ret; > + > RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->rx_queue_intr_disable, -ENOTSUP); > return eth_err(port_id, (*dev->dev_ops->rx_queue_intr_disable)(dev, > queue_id)); > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h > index 5bcfbb8..f4cc591 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h > @@ -4721,7 +4721,8 @@ rte_eth_rx_queue_count(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue_id) > RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -EINVAL); > dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id]; > RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->rx_queue_count, -ENOTSUP); > - if (queue_id >= dev->data->nb_rx_queues) > + if (queue_id >= dev->data->nb_rx_queues || > + dev->data->rx_queues[queue_id] == NULL) > return -EINVAL; > > return (int)(*dev->rx_queue_count)(dev, queue_id); >