From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Ilya Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] net/pcap: remove single interface constraint (v2)
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 14:57:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c209d9c-3109-8f75-c866-ef6bddd5dae8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BFDB638E-C70B-4709-8C8D-5E7153D60AFA@gmail.com>
On 11/5/2017 2:15 AM, Ilya Matveychikov wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> This patch removes single interface constraint from the libpcap-based PMD.
> The problem it solves is to allow PCAP device consists of more than single
> device:
>
> # testpmd --vdev net_pcap0,iface=vethA,iface=vethB,iface=vethC and so..
>
> I found the issue when performed RSS emulation based on PCAP PMD. For my
> task I had to create multi-queue PCAP device based on a number of veth
> devices which in turn was combined in bonding device.
Hi Ilya,
Overall patch looks good.
But patch does two things,
1- remove "single_iface" variable and replace it with
"internals->tx_queue[0].pcap == internals->rx_queue[0].pcap" checks.
perhaps variable name is misleading but it is to say Rx and Tx are not
different, but single interface, which is still valid.
2- Add multi-queue support. For this case, replace hardcoded queue 0 to variable
length.
Would you mind keeping "single_iface" as it is but add multi-queue support?
Also, multi-queue support for other types seems broken, if you have time can you
please send a patch to fix them as well, see below [1] for detail.
Thanks,
ferruh
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya V. Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com>
<...>
> @@ -737,9 +744,14 @@ open_rx_tx_iface(const char *key, const char *value, void *extra_args)
> if (open_single_iface(iface, &pcap) < 0)
> return -1;
>
> - tx->queue[0].pcap = pcap;
> - tx->queue[0].name = iface;
> - tx->queue[0].type = key;
> + for (i = 0; i < tx->num_of_queue; i++) {
> + if (tx->queue[i].pcap == NULL) {
[1]: This check is missing for open_rx_iface, open_tx_iface, open_rx_pcap and
open_tx_pcap.
It is possible to implement as:
for (i = 0; i < rx->num_of_queue; i++) {
if (rx->queue[i].name)
continue;
<this part is same old code>
break;
}
> + tx->queue[i].pcap = pcap;
> + tx->queue[i].name = iface;
> + tx->queue[i].type = key;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
<...>
> @@ -953,19 +960,21 @@ pmd_pcap_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
> * If iface argument is passed we open the NICs and use them for
> * reading / writing
> */
> - if (rte_kvargs_count(kvlist, ETH_PCAP_IFACE_ARG) == 1) {
> + if (rte_kvargs_count(kvlist, ETH_PCAP_IFACE_ARG)) {
> + int i, queues = rte_kvargs_count(kvlist, ETH_PCAP_IFACE_ARG);
Can prevent duplicate call of rte_kvargs_count() by moving queues above if.
<...>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-06 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-05 7:41 [dpdk-dev] net/pcap: remove single interface constraint Ilya Matveychikov
2017-11-05 10:15 ` [dpdk-dev] net/pcap: remove single interface constraint (v2) Ilya Matveychikov
2017-11-06 22:57 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c209d9c-3109-8f75-c866-ef6bddd5dae8@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matvejchikov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).