From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796AEA0A0C; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:02:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A0D4118D; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:01:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBBE411BE; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:01:41 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10029"; a="188482992" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,308,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="188482992" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jun 2021 01:01:40 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,308,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="408072230" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.221.122]) ([10.213.221.122]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jun 2021 01:01:39 -0700 To: Dmitry Kozlyuk Cc: web@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon , John McNamara , dev@dpdk.org References: <20210624144513.3094257-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20210624183004.60afaf74@sovereign> From: Ferruh Yigit X-User: ferruhy Message-ID: <4c31fa8a-98e2-c6d0-b669-2f6f5d262f5a@intel.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:01:35 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210624183004.60afaf74@sovereign> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] add testing requirement for new PMDs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 6/24/2021 4:30 PM, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote: > 2021-06-24 15:45 (UTC+0100), Ferruh Yigit: >> As discussed in the technical board meeting >> https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html >> >> This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit >> --- >> CC: John McNamara >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org >> --- >> content/testing/_index.md | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/content/testing/_index.md b/content/testing/_index.md >> index fcdc47feca9a..3e430f8640af 100644 >> --- a/content/testing/_index.md >> +++ b/content/testing/_index.md >> @@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ some validation reports are requested to the community members. >> >> Such release validations are sent as replies to the release announcement. >> >> +It is not easy (or not possible at all) to test PMDs other than device vendors, > > I'm not a native speaker, but is "for" missing (to do X is easy for Y)? > Suggestion: for anyone other than device vendors. > Thanks Dmitry, I consulted to John for it, I am sending a new version soon. >> +that is why it is expected vendors send a release validation report at least in >> +the first release that the PMD is upstreamed. >> + >> >> ## Tools >> --- >