From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com>,
"Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
"Stillwell Jr, Paul M" <paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com>,
"Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
"Rong, Leyi" <leyi.rong@intel.com>,
"Shukla, Shivanshu" <shivanshu.shukla@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/ice/base: fix build with gcc11
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 18:31:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e228093-74a3-6051-83f5-e19ffa8fc82c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN8PR11MB3795D500A160C08DE770EB10F7549@BN8PR11MB3795.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 5/10/2021 6:13 PM, Wang, Haiyue wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wang, Haiyue
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 01:05
>> To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
>> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Stillwell Jr, Paul M <paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo
>> <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Rong, Leyi <leyi.rong@intel.com>; Shukla, Shivanshu
>> <Shivanshu.Shukla@intel.com>
>> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org; Kevin Traynor
>> <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
>> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/ice/base: fix build with gcc11
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
>>> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 23:03
>>> To: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Stillwell Jr, Paul M
>>> <paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Rong, Leyi
>> <leyi.rong@intel.com>;
>>> Shukla, Shivanshu <shivanshu.shukla@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org; Kevin Traynor
>>> <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/ice/base: fix build with gcc11
>>>
>>> Reproduced with '--buildtype=debugoptimized' config,
>>> compiler version: gcc (GCC) 12.0.0 20210509 (experimental)
>>>
>>> There are multiple build errors, like:
>>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c: In function ‘ice_add_marker_act’:
>>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c:3727:15:
>>> warning: array subscript ‘struct ice_aqc_sw_rules_elem[0]’
>>> is partly outside array bounds of ‘unsigned char[52]’
>>> [-Warray-bounds]
>>> 3727 | lg_act->type = CPU_TO_LE16(ICE_AQC_SW_RULES_T_LG_ACT);
>>> | ^~
>>> In file included from ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_type.h:52,
>>> from ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_common.h:8,
>>> from ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.h:8,
>>> from ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c:5:
>>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_osdep.h:209:29:
>>> note: referencing an object of size 52 allocated by ‘rte_zmalloc’
>>> 209 | #define ice_malloc(h, s) rte_zmalloc(NULL, s, 0)
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c:3720:50:
>>> note: in expansion of macro ‘ice_malloc’
>>> lg_act = (struct ice_aqc_sw_rules_elem *)ice_malloc(hw, rules_size);
>>>
>>> These errors are mainly because allocated memory is cast to
>>> "struct ice_aqc_sw_rules_elem *" but allocated size is less than the size
>>> of "struct ice_aqc_sw_rules_elem".
>>>
>>> "struct ice_aqc_sw_rules_elem" has multiple other structs has unions,
>>> based on which one is used allocated memory being less than the size of
>>> "struct ice_aqc_sw_rules_elem" is logically correct but compiler is
>>> complaining about it.
>>>
>>> As a solution making sure allocated memory size is at least size of
>>> "struct ice_aqc_sw_rules_elem".
>>> The function to use the struct is 'ice_aq_sw_rules()', and it already has
>>> parameter for size of the rule, allocating more than needed shouldn't
>>> cause any problem.
>>>
>>> Fixes: c7dd15931183 ("net/ice/base: add virtual switch code")
>>> Fixes: 02acdce2f553 ("net/ice/base: add MAC filter with marker and counter")
>>> Fixes: f89aa3affa9e ("net/ice/base: support removing advanced rule")
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> Cc: paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com
>>> Cc: qi.z.zhang@intel.com
>>> Cc: leyi.rong@intel.com
>>> Cc: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> GCC bug ?
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98266
>>
>> Bug 98266 - [11 Regression] bogus array subscript is partly outside array bounds on virtual
>> inheritance
>>
>
> Disable this gcc warning ? ;-)
>
That is an option as well but I prefer to fix it warning as much as possible
(unless false positive warnings).
What do you think about the patch? Do you see any problem with it?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=44720996e2d79e47d508b0abe99b931a726a3197
>
> gcc-10: disable 'array-bounds' warning for now
>
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> 2.31.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-10 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-10 15:03 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/bnx2x: " Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-10 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-10 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/ice/base: " Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-10 17:04 ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-05-10 17:13 ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-05-10 17:31 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2021-05-10 17:55 ` Stillwell Jr, Paul M
2021-05-10 17:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-11 1:59 ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-05-11 9:33 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-11 9:08 ` Kevin Traynor
2021-05-10 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/tap: " Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-11 12:28 ` Kevin Traynor
2021-05-11 11:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] net/bnx2x: " Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-11 11:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-11 12:27 ` Kevin Traynor
2021-05-11 11:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/ice/base: " Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-11 11:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/tap: " Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-11 12:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] net/bnx2x: " Kevin Traynor
2021-05-11 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-11 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-11 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] net/ice/base: " Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-12 7:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Wang, Haiyue
2021-05-11 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] net/tap: " Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-12 13:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] net/bnx2x: " Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e228093-74a3-6051-83f5-e19ffa8fc82c@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=leyi.rong@intel.com \
--cc=paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=shivanshu.shukla@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).