From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com [209.65.160.86]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2372BD1 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:05:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown [193.34.186.16] (EHLO webmail.solarflare.com) by nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.4-7) with ESMTP id 91d43185.2b7a63e72940.2116699.00-2450.4752355.nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:05:29 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 58134d196a677efb-54dca8a230e3077d5eef74d17d7715bf67c04f86 Received: from unknown [193.34.186.16] (EHLO webmail.solarflare.com) by nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.4-7) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 81d43185.0.2116695.00-2240.4752344.nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:05:28 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 58134d183d69a302-62afed395ca2d2fc28e575fdb754e0135e115abf Received: from [192.168.38.17] (84.52.89.52) by ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:05:24 +0100 To: Thomas Monjalon References: <7987614.kmGMHz0qWb@xps13> <2de43e28-37f8-86f5-b45f-2e598137b3dc@solarflare.com> <1838661.tWJoShD1UF@xps13> From: Andrew Rybchenko Message-ID: <4e5189f0-d340-ae7c-0300-aefd64041022@solarflare.com> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:05:20 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1838661.tWJoShD1UF@xps13> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [84.52.89.52] X-ClientProxiedBy: ocex03.SolarFlarecom.com (10.20.40.36) To ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-11.0.0.1191-8.000.1202-22664.003 X-TM-AS-Result: No--1.555500-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.1 cv=YdO7kllf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=8P+NB+fYZDP74ap4g4d9Kw==] X-AnalysisOut: [:17 a=RB3BGLmKESwA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=CH0kA5CcgfcA:10 ] X-AnalysisOut: [a=jR_pbKbQ2G5SJiy-9IAA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10] X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2015072901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [193.34.186.16] Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Solarflare PMD submission question X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:05:30 -0000 On 10/28/2016 03:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-10-28 13:50, Andrew Rybchenko: >> First of all I'd like to double check that it is clear that we discuss >> libefx >> (base driver in terms of DPDK) import here. The PMD itself is already split >> in 20+ patches. > I don't know libefx. In DPDK, a base driver is often a subdirectory > inside the PMD. Will it be the case? Yes. Just to be absolutely sure: are the discussed requirements to split applicable to base driver import? Andrew.