From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED0C2B91 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 16:18:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id v199so28590195wmv.0 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:18:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nv697iNBvNrTyK/1AG/nkh6028GwNzc2Gm6p+iam94Y=; b=eMJUBSm+ckBXU3z1TOdtL18Uej6XIcszu0YVwgPnQoLgVcATzoOpOKF5MqjsDR9S7n qjlGNTFwJHTg+a9SNKZrHnExMlhz6lQzZDpRUOYjj+xyQXJpK6/Vbnbvu0/cfeR9diHl FHX+MNfR5PpA5je9IZt/7aFy+z1Vu65pAvUvYVHeyKr1Stre/mj+h1Ty8fzeKXdmIkjQ Piym6d94rnXKVeK5SH6ACVEJkk1B0582U2wq7dR33QUo8omA69XalOMpjtKcpYl/Z9nj /myWg2x7BfZIoc3VH6nWSKvKJ8bPaA/UImFJN7kTO3ytHkzfRV2u44OoSCJ5/EXBVID4 eWsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nv697iNBvNrTyK/1AG/nkh6028GwNzc2Gm6p+iam94Y=; b=eJkd5ejBuLlIsr1ciGWJLT8gyOD49aL/vwWPq7QJg9YRFMWzGSetpr/dsVb339zB6X Ls5Yr6g/8od8dN0XKhrZFC89SbzZu6Y6L60yUYWwab1FSPr64BK0I4awSSVrF3c7k6RK Rl2vfgaLgTaI/2s98H9e5UPbdBuXzKg0pJZu0EY8f9gBbAePtf+/ClM4sQExLf+qvsbl QX/5kNusSSN7j8yCioPvEPbSJBLxIgy3DzV0VcQNXYtHn624KpLy+QCLFe0lx8grb8px H9iSybHRgZGDaNNHO/wpwxmDNklccZdpB5W/d31Hl/BMA3mqFRo+aVUMWShhSB6BFBvv vBiw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLimhWFyQG06hQpUYX0ofsieRgrrUuFrr1r/mxr/0BgUlfB78v40DeemyLZYLj7jdH+ X-Received: by 10.28.44.131 with SMTP id s125mr18926701wms.61.1467382718245; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bu7sm3623085wjc.42.2016.07.01.07.18.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:18:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Olivier Matz , konstantin.ananyev@intel.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 16:18:36 +0200 Message-ID: <5113869.20L6IQKHmh@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1467362632-1533-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> References: <1467362632-1533-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: enhance api doc for getting supported packet types X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:18:38 -0000 2016-07-01 10:43, Olivier Matz: > As discussed in http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-June/042229.html, > clarify the behavior of rte_eth_dev_get_supported_ptypes(). > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz Konstantin had already reviewed this text in the above thread. Applied, thanks Are we sure every drivers are satisfying this new constraint?