From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48B1A0A02; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:57:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80370140DDC; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:57:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EE3140DCE for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:57:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1CC5C00FD; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:57:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:57:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= ddHrQPoe2TaPCgL/NP0PcpOWQtjLlC0IOVVsmGW0z18=; b=OLCQm29iUMYCukZ7 3yDSv1HJunsQ4dWfhCs++EzqTB8RuUfqH44JvUR1TvQ6y/oieZs199MpT6jWcwoh eJUyKsgLk2qXJ0pH8XrFK6clGNSD3mhCojQ9vB8xQirVWAQZVb+/oWuG1vgvXf1D XIH027l1Rrx+ZBVm7G/kskHXOSRNYYHv8Br/aOeJTDiIeMuMhrfLOOrY41zYJW1a 3HciklSxQvLNFRj33o5RvbzXBpdsnQacsBdW2PpWfhpDtec54lL9QhFkuxzrKNW9 CnQmIBxx4BosmjALJrauZeRSRxhylrKxQ/Ci1p+Ie7CFBqRAUIHPFlh/4uPV4Q7I /tfl9Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ddHrQPoe2TaPCgL/NP0PcpOWQtjLlC0IOVVsmGW0z 18=; b=GhqV3emVg7n4p9S5pqOHLXR1rTp19jLZOWmbsx5w02G71Om55ZoPXHWXs 3cPINoJUbfv7vWMvQ3ARecCzSjytbQMFNysbLHJtNlyEGnXfwl5u8PvpBCtII8sx 3Ob1xAjJiOVgzcfcQvuuG2D8/noegiENqnW9e/sMYRaUr1r9BehTtM5lNFgUGhkR K15/wjZE2B56Cn0sIf728fTQwDnGWumYDO7PY8JqP4xFWjpkTowr8mDYCHK6mQvl DK9GOxKvePLdroBirRdjYQxrMwmGfPYXtNr9kPtOh0MFeu9FEsdF4AOwIDz3Fjyn EU18xj77kDgEL+j7cmmDOk9ko8Aqw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudehtddgjeduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffdvffejueetleefieeludduuefgteejleevfeekjeefieegheet ffdvkeefgedunecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrd dvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhf rhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 194831080067; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:57:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Pavan Nikhilesh Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jerin Jacob , "Kinsella, Ray" , dpdk-dev , Harman Kalra , Nithin Dabilpuram , David Marchand , Jerin Jacob Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:57:08 +0100 Message-ID: <5158764.JivBLqzAeP@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210225170238.15581-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> <5442273.ffSK4IfYTI@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] common/octeontx: enable build only on 64bit Linux X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 25/03/2021 13:46, Jerin Jacob: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 4:33 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 25/03/2021 11:58, Kinsella, Ray: > > > On 25/03/2021 10:46, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > 25/03/2021 11:42, Thomas Monjalon: > > > >> I've reorganized the commits per family of drivers, > > > >> so it makes more sense than grouping per driver class > > > >> with "common/octeontx" for title for all: > > > >> > > > >> net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > > > >> common/octeontx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > > > >> common/octeontx2: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > > > >> > > > >> and applied. > > > > > > > > Actually not applied yet. > > > > I'm not sure what to do for the ABI check which is broken > > > > because some drivers are not compiled anymore in 32-bit build. > > > > I've workarounded locally by removing the dump files in the reference build. > > > > Should we add an exception in libabigail.abignore? > > > > > > > In the past we said that depreciating HW support would be considered to be same as an ABI Breakage. > > > > > > From the policy ... > > > "Updates to the minimum hardware requirements, which drop support for hardware which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI change." > > > > So the patches should wait 21.11. > > Everybody agree? > > Looks good to me to postpone. The v2 is waiting in patchwork with the status "Deferred": https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=15885&state=*