From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
To: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
thomas@monjalon.net, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
declan.doherty@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, benjamin.h.shelton@intel.com,
narender.vangati@intel.com, beilei.xing@intel.com,
wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, 0000-cover-letter.patch@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/4] ethdev: claim device reset as async
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 12:15:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <516ab569-12d1-8c73-b14c-4a5784c71559@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180808070045.13334-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
On 08/08/2018 08:00 AM, Qi Zhang wrote:
> rte_eth_dev_reset should be implemented in an async way since it is
> possible be invoked in interrupt thread and sometimes to reset a
> device need to wait for some dependency, for example, a VF expects
> for PF ready, or a NIC function as part of a SOC wait for the whole
> system reset complete, all these time consuming task will block the
> the interrupt thread.
> The patch claims rte_eth_dev_reset is an async function and introduce
> a new event RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET_COMPLETE. PMD should raise this event
> when finish reset in background. The applicaiton should always wait
> for this event before continue to configure and restart the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> index 7070e9ab4..541b5161d 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> @@ -1814,21 +1814,34 @@ void rte_eth_dev_close(uint16_t port_id);
> * RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET event is detected, but can also use it to start
> * a port reset in other circumstances.
> *
> - * When this function is called, it first stops the port and then calls the
> - * PMD specific dev_uninit( ) and dev_init( ) to return the port to initial
> - * state, in which no Tx and Rx queues are setup, as if the port has been
> - * reset and not started. The port keeps the port id it had before the
> - * function call.
> - *
> - * After calling rte_eth_dev_reset( ), the application should use
> - * rte_eth_dev_configure( ), rte_eth_rx_queue_setup( ),
> - * rte_eth_tx_queue_setup( ), and rte_eth_dev_start( )
> - * to reconfigure the device as appropriate.
> - *
> - * Note: To avoid unexpected behavior, the application should stop calling
> - * Tx and Rx functions before calling rte_eth_dev_reset( ). For thread
> - * safety, all these controlling functions should be called from the same
> - * thread.
> + * @note
> + * Device reset may have the dependency, for example, a VF reset expects
> + * PF ready, or a NIC function as a part of a SOC need to wait for other
> + * parts of the system be ready, these are time-consuming tasks and will
> + * block current thread.
> + *
> + * So we claimed rte_eth_dev_reset as an async API, that makes things easy
> + * for an application that what to reset the device from the interrupt
> + * thread since typically a RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET handler is invoked in
> + * interrupt thread.
> + *
> + * PMD is responsrible to implement ops->dev_reset in an async way, it can
> + * offload the whole task into a separate thread, or maybe just pending on
> + * hardware interrupt as reset dependency ready or start a timely alarm
> + * to poll register status as a background daemon. PMD is also responsible
> + * to raise the RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET_COMPLETE event to notify the application
> + * when reset is complete.
> + *
> + * Application should not assume device reset is finished after
> + * rte_eth_dev_reset return, it should always wait for a
> + * RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET_COMPLETE event and check the reset result.
> + * If reset success, application should call rte_eth_dev_configure( ),
> + * rte_eth_rx_queue_setup( ), rte_eth_tx_queue_setup( ),
> + * and rte_eth_dev_start( ) to reconfigure the device as appropriate.
> + *
If you intend to make this change for 18.11, then I think you need to
document it as part of 18.08. The function signature isn't changing, but
the meaning of success is entirely different now.
> + * @Note
> + * To avoid unexpected behavior, the application should stop calling
> + * Tx and Rx functions before calling rte_eth_dev_reset( ).
> *
> * @param port_id
> * The port identifier of the Ethernet device.
> @@ -1838,9 +1851,6 @@ void rte_eth_dev_close(uint16_t port_id);
> * - (-EINVAL) if port identifier is invalid.
> * - (-ENOTSUP) if hardware doesn't support this function.
> * - (-EPERM) if not ran from the primary process.
> - * - (-EIO) if re-initialisation failed or device is removed.
> - * - (-ENOMEM) if the reset failed due to OOM.
> - * - (-EAGAIN) if the reset temporarily failed and should be retried later.
> */
> int rte_eth_dev_reset(uint16_t port_id);
>
> @@ -2574,6 +2584,8 @@ enum rte_eth_event_type {
> /**< queue state event (enabled/disabled) */
> RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET,
> /**< reset interrupt event, sent to VF on PF reset */
> + RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET_COMPLETE,
> + /**< inform application that reset is completed */
> RTE_ETH_EVENT_VF_MBOX, /**< message from the VF received by PF */
> RTE_ETH_EVENT_MACSEC, /**< MACsec offload related event */
> RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RMV, /**< device removal event */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-08 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-08 7:00 Qi Zhang
2018-08-08 7:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/4] net/i40e: enable async device reset Qi Zhang
2018-08-08 7:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Qi Zhang
2018-08-08 7:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 4/4] testpmd: " Qi Zhang
2018-08-08 11:15 ` Kevin Traynor [this message]
2018-08-15 1:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/4] ethdev: claim device reset as async Zhang, Qi Z
2018-08-08 15:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-08 15:22 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-08-09 0:41 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=516ab569-12d1-8c73-b14c-4a5784c71559@redhat.com \
--to=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=0000-cover-letter.patch@dpdk.org \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=benjamin.h.shelton@intel.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=narender.vangati@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).