DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: huangdengdui <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <thomas@monjalon.net>, <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
	<david.marchand@redhat.com>, <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>,
	"Wei Hu (Xavier)" <xavier.huwei@huawei.com>,
	Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net/hns3: fix simple Tx path incorrect free the mbuf
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 15:43:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51df8d40-c158-4b67-98b0-ca4517f4bd2c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250108085740.65815a35@pi5>


On 2025/1/9 0:57, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:40:43 +0800
> Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2024/12/31 1:55, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 14:54:03 +0800
>>> Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> From: Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com>
>>>> To: <dev@dpdk.org>, <thomas@monjalon.net>, <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,  <david.marchand@redhat.com>, <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>, Chengwen Feng  <fengchengwen@huawei.com>, "Wei Hu (Xavier)" <xavier.huwei@huawei.com>,  Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>> CC: <haijie1@huawei.com>, <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] net/hns3: fix simple Tx path incorrect free the mbuf
>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 14:54:03 +0800
>>>> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0
>>>>
>>>> From: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
>>>>
>>>> When RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE offload is not set,
>>>> use rte_pktmbuf_free_seg() to free the mbuf.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 7ef933908f04 ("net/hns3: add simple Tx path")
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com>  
>>>
>>> What about the fast free case which is using rte_mempool_put_bulk when
>>> it should use rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk instead?
>>>
>>>   
>> Hi, Stephen Hemminger,
>>
>> During the fast free case, the performance of using
>> rte_mempool_put_bulk is higher than that of using
>> rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk because other references
>> to mbuf do not need to be considered. So it's better
>>   to not change.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jie Hai
> 
> The problem is that having an open coded version of this buried in
> one driver is a long term potential proble>
> If you really think that optimizing free like this is noticeable, then
> why not make a new function "rte_pktmuf_fast_free_bulk" and put it in the
> regular mbuf library.
> 

Do you mean to add the following functions to the library?

void rte_pktmbuf_fast_free_bulk(struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned int count)
{
	rte_mempool_put_bulk(mbufs[0]->pool, (void **)mbufs, count);
}

The driver uses rte_mempool_put_bulk only when the following conditions are met:
1. All mbufs comes from the same mempool
2. All mbufs have only one reference.
3. All mbufs have only one segment.
So the rte_pktmbuf_fast_free_bulk function is just a wrapper around the rte_mempool_put_bulk function.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-09  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-30  6:54 [PATCH 0/3] net/hns3: bugfix on hns3 Jie Hai
2024-12-30  6:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] net/hns3: fix simple Tx path incorrect free the mbuf Jie Hai
2024-12-30 17:55   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-08  2:40     ` Jie Hai
2025-01-08 16:57       ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-09  7:43         ` huangdengdui [this message]
2025-01-09 17:03           ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-12-30  6:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] net/hns3: remove pvid info dump for VF Jie Hai
2024-12-30  6:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] net/hns3: rename RAS module Jie Hai
2024-12-30 17:51 ` [PATCH 0/3] net/hns3: bugfix on hns3 Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51df8d40-c158-4b67-98b0-ca4517f4bd2c@huawei.com \
    --to=huangdengdui@huawei.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=haijie1@huawei.com \
    --cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=xavier.huwei@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).