From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CA9460ED; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 16:16:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764A3402D5; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 16:16:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00144402BC for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 16:16:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF3C1007; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:16:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.32.19] (JR4XG4HTQC.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.32.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 471273F66E; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:16:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5203d31b-d600-494b-bb1a-459e7413ba6f@arm.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:16:05 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dts: fix checksum suite docstring/variable format Content-Language: en-GB To: Dean Marx , probb@iol.unh.edu, npratte@iol.unh.edu, yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, paul.szczepanek@arm.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org References: <20250116184322.2750-1-dmarx@iol.unh.edu> From: Luca Vizzarro In-Reply-To: <20250116184322.2750-1-dmarx@iol.unh.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Looks good, thanks. Just one nit. Reviewed-by: Luca Vizzarro On 16/01/2025 18:43, Dean Marx wrote: > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ def send_packets_and_verify( > packet_list: List of Scapy packets to send and verify. > load: Raw layer load attribute in the sent packet. > should_receive: Indicates whether the packet should be received > - by the traffic generator. > + by the traffic generator. > """ I am assuming this was unintentional? As it's meant to be the way it was before. Keep the indentation as it's not a new argument, but part of the previous one.