From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD2D918F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  7 Jun 2016 16:03:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id k204so70786655wmk.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 07:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=6cQp/2CPmNidFhjv+K0LFVQwtRabBkOx04gfvzoJN+A=;
 b=HquLJCIiVUNAawPyG7tyFY7065ZgXJ/3L0fyLMOde8R9fduzd83ukpdH8DPYfeTOQ3
 PFBls1Y267CsnbUABrxa7IcCqCgMmlV4VHkcPn2jKPiKVrtYOssJQblQXz4BklQcNbZO
 RmBenqAGG73ST9Qjov7AZWcHXoTsOR6BvsTvjoiqsLBOl2mwRxDjAxbUEl2brff6mPdH
 ux4RaRjdEM52/Ep/zYuJWaEuT1WnBU09nhi6rfH5lyU0SNNJv6NM63iGvShviVwf34Ql
 CQfLg2c6NX3ENLBLGdzzxhlba9WYzL2y+N0bIoQI8oDQpFpXNBlsy+f4qe6YXSYl1DPq
 lD4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent
 :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=6cQp/2CPmNidFhjv+K0LFVQwtRabBkOx04gfvzoJN+A=;
 b=V5c36g4NYXDh55anVHV2sF8LYeQ8OD+2yOzTZnWgNOtM5sv4QBl0mO3V0wCmnqJwYt
 FAwhFR559xRHwaVVaMZvK2SKuMnssyh4SnzzoHtfNbFlXagzXUwFtskgdF6jGGXgCVkG
 Y+qCtMPPMINcRyUWpSe41z3bAVZ0qaXS3klxnsWs57QSix454F69wju0NdD6/p/HcGIz
 eiyjL+qzDgLtxH6Ysy3GEj5kSAoRozO1TEYo5T/6FwvEWNNyFknK/UZGaF7dN42EXgyh
 uO5S4NOlLtB3VkmunSQhE58f2rOotOU9pxNa3V/o1AgzVluiAuCO31351E/8ypCjs9OR
 WHKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKpRye80DVRFYmuQXknV1FNvoMgU4J0A7ImGaKKn4t7+zH7n/7hG1CWlrXYAtI0KJzJ
X-Received: by 10.194.103.105 with SMTP id fv9mr20951230wjb.162.1465308215947; 
 Tue, 07 Jun 2016 07:03:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q71sm1488639wme.17.2016.06.07.07.03.35
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Tue, 07 Jun 2016 07:03:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Tomasz Kantecki <tomasz.kantecki@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 16:03:34 +0200
Message-ID: <5309764.cBvyyiAfAy@xps13>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1465307358-115427-1-git-send-email-tomasz.kantecki@intel.com>
References: <1465307358-115427-1-git-send-email-tomasz.kantecki@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: reduced duration of red_autotest
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 14:03:36 -0000

Hi Tomasz,

Thanks for splitting tests.

2016-06-07 14:49, Tomasz Kantecki:
> 'red_autotest' changed to run only functional tests without test #4 which was
> taking ~53 seconds. 'red_autotest' takes ~12[s] now.

12s is long for a functional test. We are used to have tests of less than 1s.
Do you think this magnitude order can be achieved for red tests?