From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tgraf@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93A06835
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  2 Apr 2014 13:09:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])
 by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s32BBUfq004251
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
 Wed, 2 Apr 2014 07:11:30 -0400
Received: from lsx.localdomain (vpn1-7-206.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.7.206])
 by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id
 s32BBQMo029904; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 07:11:27 -0400
Message-ID: <533BF05E.9000904@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 13:11:26 +0200
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
 Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>
References: <1391529271-24606-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
 <1391529271-24606-4-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
 <20140224165208.GF27503@x220.localdomain> <4232273.mks7Rollq1@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <4232273.mks7Rollq1@xps13>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 11:09:57 -0000

On 04/02/2014 11:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for the long delay.
>
> 2014-02-24 08:52, Chris Wright:
>>>   pkg/rpm.spec |  143
>>
>> This should be dpdk.spec
>
> Actually it should be dpdk-core.spec.
> Since it is a file hosted in the project, is it mandatory to have such naming?
> Could you explain why?
> When building it with "rpmbuild -ta dpdk.tar.gz", the .spec name has no
> importance.

You are right, it doesn't matter for external building but this would
likely get pointed at in the Fedora package review process.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name