From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E3C2B98 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:18:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id l68so18370216wml.0 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 05:18:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+Uvj3c1eU46b1yzxFlYkDCxxMHQMd7aF1sO1tSBxwdU=; b=2Hol8susnNkFlDm152YNgiwoxs5X/+VKRE7AgFkUYc1rwXml30RRK/3k4lh2qte7to sPtDL1oy0nYNNdMNwCYf4+s5bpnYQHG9GgI8Bc2zIsnTdwxMTAyeUZ/pyQGGXAI9Ut23 am1k19giferPv7T76Q03qE2XM3WKragF4UeukE2LBG+SAzw0YKqrh9Y/AsJw5TxmfZ3O wfgu0pczd4vi8oYwF8inuBEWNgrS4z/0T2N1Q1Q5s5OHa6lTTSH/Kl4f8UXpa2gUrsvO GQjlu8Uav3C4umrBemy2jx79J2QXyH34CwyoWaYfwIOtSrsjxPurmGqEZL6pYxuEB/aQ KmIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+Uvj3c1eU46b1yzxFlYkDCxxMHQMd7aF1sO1tSBxwdU=; b=TP38KfegWb12FQRNrywIBUj8PTnXImtyLREAvMf4QhjqYB8QXD4EupAtUmJQOaIgfA /6f9xPHKfolcAsvZatrj9fqNND8eV3utMRJ3I/QK4UyftymDZpi0A1zUflEgD3CeA36V Q3/KTURHPdHExGVXkVpcsTwY4uSuLxEwSIYs7K9PvKsnKwGnt8YyOgkK2olMS8fNM7sR VdRMPkZ4v9gOZEEqqC7wUhWSzag15DlSqi9CjQIQg2KfrbJlppmdBZ+OTpKQVLKZIIbs thaYyXB63urEcj7VmkldGvqeHk0m7FuqNJj2DHsyEbc9FMO58fjYU0HPac10u3VUmwni Yj8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJaM2nMgU3twbKGlapda5++k/4yH3i7SDJ7hhpRNHuZn3BSZxwVDCxZDVm9H1Tf4IMt X-Received: by 10.28.50.133 with SMTP id y127mr2825509wmy.4.1457702321127; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 05:18:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (91.111.75.86.rev.sfr.net. [86.75.111.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j10sm8428235wjb.46.2016.03.11.05.18.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 Mar 2016 05:18:40 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Olivier MATZ Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:16:36 +0100 Message-ID: <5375042.yDKAvMJ3bF@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <56E2BC8A.8070801@6wind.com> References: <1450321921-27799-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> <1454043483-24579-6-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> <56E2BC8A.8070801@6wind.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/8] vhost: claim that we support GUEST_ANNOUNCE feature X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:18:41 -0000 2016-03-11 13:39, Olivier MATZ: > I'm trying to compile the dpdk on an debian-7, and it fails due > to this patch. Indeed, the define VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE is > not present in /usr/include/linux/virtio_net.h on this distribution. It will be fixed by this patch: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/11195/ > I'm wondering if the librte_vhost shouldn't embed its own version > of virtio_net.h instead of relying on the one from the distribution. > It seems it has been done this way for the virtio guest PMD in > dpdk.org/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h. > > What do you think?