From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B80A09E4; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:10:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592564067A; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:10:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F50D40395 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:10:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D489ED5; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 06:10:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 06:10:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= LrZoignlUdVS7VTKNdBr77CcOrJK+mje6ntpwgolLf0=; b=DPfM+TGaLVMqYvEg 538K2LWNMEKIyHRhAT8HBgi8FbO4vYVIJi2uBthl89ID5gV1w02NbfRDVzpQFcBs LwNnTaaMWG0Tr0M5WDJiRybdmnyS3dEg7jJyv6EAZGDgJ2i4e0jAzqpGO4FhHkWt 2Wp25mGYUROOdPoKT1oOMZjDAtS4QrBmZ5ikhcfUxscxU6BNWhp+8QWGn2U68u1p sgVHlxuTSKpcP2F3ohKZwNxJgvkjxTi2jrW9v2MlzVHz8iBwhbaRpHMI1mDb7pju 1NyU+3IiXiueHN5rgadFZyGpqIkLLMOEMpOzqjKvxZUIX+jaHMtwYGQzXlzICbmS f6vi/g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=LrZoignlUdVS7VTKNdBr77CcOrJK+mje6ntpwgolL f0=; b=lq/A7v+9AxwvIFnEAqiN+Ah53PC1rMpKj6HGdBye9sUXNupfaT3QhPbN+ s4KBFtZF/wxLIpLjKE2lgqQCaA54SYtQ2tn8Qgya5pKIDcjKr4vmPN9pO5esdx3z gWxiynmrPyM0pJ58DZsqQ3myoEVop52h2b5cqp/rHp+h2AaunsWuv//BJf8Vbp55 25nZTQjxZC5fsqtBSqmYyR0hDHCJxpl+Zeo5QGI5y1K/ExWGgBXB9ai+dRSGwOw2 2cpQ758b7fQBeFi7kCEYBO3pTAgM/abRbJ7chWkHwz+ApaYpI9SYylKYodqJnkd+ tUqu/kdbznA+yOMckRCr1q6ptQKOw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfedtgddvfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 08D3C240066; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 06:10:42 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:10:41 +0100 Message-ID: <5391890.O0HVAa98rt@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210127173330.1671341-8-bruce.richardson@intel.com> References: <20210114110606.21142-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20210127173330.1671341-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20210127173330.1671341-8-bruce.richardson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 7/8] devtools: remove check-includes script X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 27/01/2021 18:33, Bruce Richardson: > +* The ``check-includes.sh`` script for checking DPDK header files has been > + removed, being replaced by the ``check_includes`` build option described above. How do they compare? Is the new test checking C++ compliance? pedantic?