From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813ED4261F; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 20:02:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5076B40150; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 20:02:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9D64013F for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 20:02:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFED7320090C; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 14:02:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 14:02:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1695405764; x=1695492164; bh=Yyl/Fxgo3ES5x+FBfe4W+Ut73bFt5Nk/W9q yCEku4t0=; b=AZOeeJrarMw+vCq3vlgDc61TneWNDPrHN3r1IaHHOH1197ZTvoF piVe+t2l1/y4Xqlr5VEr4Fy/HOOIINK7XfWzPmr/dJYUygD2PkIJXvJ9h8NRz5DR 25JgyFLDFWAa+Eh9Z5w6DQb23GIBCdp6A8rIggpqZIGpVitTOoFH/qQj4ZlZ06o2 wSefLF0GvMDYbImSVKGd4pigK2MuoES8qXU/JrBuEyZz2be8171l93EQg7TH/HT9 ayeyIsD+7a78J3WwfNGIULAUVy7gYuYwDAsLuU93/dACHSi/aBpx1uEcbkAbqB/a MF+UOoDp6ac41Sb1vm4V6VxG1Nm1tg7mesQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1695405764; x=1695492164; bh=Yyl/Fxgo3ES5x+FBfe4W+Ut73bFt5Nk/W9q yCEku4t0=; b=rpvaSVym4kr6BG03NAwhNfFlqni9isVk5rn1vmGG7jzOx3K9pNJ Haq2dS5p8FZ/RLQiQ8xordXTcHiUbCQWscNGIj8EsgDrKdhc5/JRUinHj8yd/oWU 8nzEdy6g8WY+VkIojQ0O9vm+4iOCuaDUy4OHf1hAniVrMHmUs8Gwu4DoIHWwVVIq OHmN/fUR+Nd0c9E5QzC5wASWJcr3rJfEiLq4y2HZQPPqogP1hsYBRAkqLpfa9CmC ax6hmgBbo7cQL0+mkzcYdfrhgKiUkIXvy+D68PH4MiU8Mdt768zfEIGofZF+9RDd IvVRI6ojzKwSo2rkNBCZtnzC6fxnf0PXiqg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrudekkedguddtudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffhvfhfvegjtgfgse htkeertddtvdejnecuhfhrohhmpeeuvghrnhguucfutghhuhgsvghrthcuoegsshgplhhi shhtshesrggrkhgvfhdrfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepff fhleeuvdeludehueevkeeigeejveeitdetueffteefkedthfeivddtudffhfegnecuffho mhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmh epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsshgplhhishhtshesrggrkhgvfhdrfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhf mh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: id8a84192:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 14:02:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <53f52296-93d5-45c0-b3e6-c200abfec298@aakef.fastmail.fm> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 20:02:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: SIGILL in rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled / RTE_CPUFLAG_RTM Content-Language: en-US, de-DE From: Bernd Schubert To: dev@dpdk.org References: <089a8254-82e8-44a1-9641-4b6da6515dde@aakef.fastmail.fm> Cc: Bernd Schubert In-Reply-To: <089a8254-82e8-44a1-9641-4b6da6515dde@aakef.fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org > > This already has been reported here > https://inbox.dpdk.org/users/C7FF2508-D633-404E-95AF-5F604D8E8E4B@intel.com/t/ > but I don't see a solution there. It just ends up asking for the line > numbers. > Well, the line is > > >      __cpuid_count(feat->leaf, feat->subleaf, >              regs[RTE_REG_EAX], regs[RTE_REG_EBX], >              regs[RTE_REG_ECX], regs[RTE_REG_EDX]); > >     /* check if the feature is enabled */ >     return (regs[feat->reg] >> feat->bit) & 1; ====> line 173 > > > Maybe this should catch SIGILL? > Hmm, after disabling 2 flags in that function (fast workaround) it continues with reflect_32bits (val=) at ../lib/net/rte_net_crc.c:96 96 if ((val & (1U << i)) != 0) (gdb) bt #0 reflect_32bits (val=) at ../lib/net/rte_net_crc.c:96 #1 crc32_eth_init_lut (poly=poly@entry=79764919, lut=lut@entry=0x7ffff70b9d40 ) at ../lib/net/rte_net_crc.c:109 #2 0x00007ffff3ffcc99 in rte_net_crc_scalar_init () at ../lib/net/rte_net_crc.c:137 #3 rte_net_crc_init () at ../lib/net/rte_net_crc.c:337 #4 0x00007ffff7fc947e in call_init (l=, argc=argc@entry=1, argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffe078, env=env@entry=0x7fffffffe088) at ./elf/dl-init.c:70 #5 0x00007ffff7fc9568 in call_init (env=0x7fffffffe088, argv=0x7fffffffe078, argc=1, l=) at ./elf/dl-init.c:33 #6 _dl_init (main_map=0x7ffff7ffe2e0, argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe078, env=0x7fffffffe088) at ./elf/dl-init.c:117 #7 0x00007ffff7fe32ea in _dl_start_user () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #8 0x0000000000000001 in ?? () #9 0x00007fffffffe356 in ?? () #10 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()