From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69AFFA034F; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:41:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA26D1607BC; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:41:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE06D4069B for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:41:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922DA5C014E; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 02:41:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 02:41:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= hiWmKmiWdHob0iWrL8XC8wFupVQjy3NNgH6Ruxf50UQ=; b=I16Bi7bMoFP3l1BT eumXWZ9uZ7GcL6M1CBEhJ80MKMU37YzptFBFsZvx1CrwDBlzfNjXBLKNM/Gno8Qe 5GSVmENX/1mUSSk00eG0FJryNLsMzlmm9Xv4RPyZ9EkvP/a1JKgjzsfRA7MW8VjI kGoZguN0vXluxk3Hd5nwRkXOHVuklYWafLf9zqiQZ8ceqVMXsnmtyZdXKp5Ecuz5 /pnh8oZ7FVRuGhCFmWO6FSNnb2V1eM3wCmzNvE6pHHqCqF7Pu8V/oALVw6Y6Gf3I qDwRUVunkzFv5pW1WENi1FxUOscFXbiqdu0aw1nJ8M/Zv4glANuimS/p4ODYgPqL /gdfCQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=hiWmKmiWdHob0iWrL8XC8wFupVQjy3NNgH6Ruxf50 UQ=; b=JhzfjqZN5rtG+TI3SjIBnYRG4qzWKhqY5SlbXyWrY3vRQKujbIP1K1Kdp lxRdBnRo9BvnHDdomm+UZxBX6dyne0jBmLL1M1ORB+jy9h6QQMDe2L2AiNBnZ4kz zaNqXfAOyqy6Zmm1C1tq5STDUEWyQh6IMW+JsaniZQJ/I6fYm3fveHHTrLdBy5aM X+1TpZDyynWpMuaP81siNhgI0zygwEYDiRGc262d7rUF0o/mK0THnbOGuv65FjmA 3k+Y71YVGw+4x6LKHt1crtTSbGQ51Tl/X9PflZEwsV/hXS1rWK4IRtOS2S2zRgcH 0DhcGKsU1AiNdbj47bYTFofdXF35g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrkeeigddutdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqre dttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshes mhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekteehtdeivefhieegje elgedufeejheekkeetueevieeuvdevuedtjeevheevteenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddv tdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2E2BC24005A; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 02:41:40 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: oulijun Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, linuxarm@openeuler.org Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:41:36 +0100 Message-ID: <5435054.rFV2aVPxyo@thomas> In-Reply-To: <56df6571-a5be-9ae2-7b36-ba3942b1dd4e@huawei.com> References: <1612356396-21309-1-git-send-email-oulijun@huawei.com> <8272685.P4bs1Us1KT@thomas> <56df6571-a5be-9ae2-7b36-ba3942b1dd4e@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] config/arm: fix Hisilicon kunpeng920 SoC build X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 24/02/2021 02:34, oulijun: >=20 > =E5=9C=A8 2021/2/10 17:41, Thomas Monjalon =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > > 03/02/2021 13:46, Lijun Ou: > >> From: Chengchang Tang > >> > >> Because of the '9ca2f16' have merged, the current hns3 > >> pmd driver can not be directly complied on the kunpeng920 > >> server board. Therefore, we need to fix the meson build. > >> Besides, add kunpeng 920 SoC meson cross compile target. > >> > >> Fixes: 9ca2f16faa7f ("config/arm: isolate generic build") > >=20 > > Why do you think this patch is fixing the one above? > > It looks just a new config, not a fix. Am I missing something? > >=20 > I'm sorry to see you so late. In the meantime, we are celebrating the=20 > Spring Festival. This patch fixes the problem. If the patch is not=20 > added, the latest version cannot be directly compiled on the Kunpeng 930= =20 > server board.In addition, the cross compilation configuration file is add= ed. Please can you explain what was removed which breaks your compilation?