From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F198A0A02; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:03:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105E34067B; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:03:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7F140147 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:03:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7741E5C00EB; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:03:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:03:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= FZnLWwyzvSxMW3LVpSa1f3Q+j0uabV6gdZ7/+TfMyjs=; b=3ZwAkWebixaB0soc zTNCLYn1fyeR/iOzYCZ3B+GMQxWSgCbEdxJ2HhnPNKNK111wI6xp1SImEyQ6I41o txnvqx6PeOnPp2TsddGR+jZIlBIH8yoyCCmAZWI2lVxM1s5ZWQ4rdYzCi5XtIB08 pkeVO0INy0I9Y8pA8wMM3NjuZaH8VKsK7DC+6Po9Ov25/E6+OUKW6Vjx9lu+e4FC 63YoRLp2/ORsLBFe6XvQu0Obox26LfqsA3XRzPd48BkfOUK8tdahO8t9yLlyCKfy TQVThfjqMtyTVVFoHFmJNjrFertPe1lE8KXjiVajKrTnDJztK8KmHvXeDYbk2qXO NjXZJg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=FZnLWwyzvSxMW3LVpSa1f3Q+j0uabV6gdZ7/+TfMy js=; b=n8h8tap+AFvfkB4r7y5Ev0VqzJsAXG4osXIfMKElVD5H0nF5rf7RQPXbF KGfj9KZw6TumxCzPVICFoeUtnhoERLLuQiaGj4fYebxTImtvGYd8kVQtef1Gno/A 3849FKJKsbi6qIJpKXr0dJOHn0OQ2BvDwpaDrIarZBiSgdrk24ZgP6sZNTGZWA2R t25SvXSgKyhE6WX+FRL7aE9OiE/iBO2I/rXppaO4/LfBpxJbXB0iMWWRM/IGYaC1 7lhNBTZO1yIwEKkwYHaTIlr1kBDSmS4XtezYru8eIXth5jU+x6fyI8RvdT83pWD+ f7x3UPQaOoIanZ9d/i/tOQEl9CpSw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudehtddgvdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 328011080054; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:03:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Pavan Nikhilesh , Jerin Jacob , "Kinsella, Ray" Cc: Jerin Jacob , dev@dpdk.org, Harman Kalra , Nithin Dabilpuram , david.marchand@redhat.com Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:03:30 +0100 Message-ID: <5442273.ffSK4IfYTI@thomas> In-Reply-To: <5cb9bec3-6d4e-7867-e8d7-9c3d55ec78ef@ashroe.eu> References: <20210225170238.15581-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> <11975004.s7UMkAiPBC@thomas> <5cb9bec3-6d4e-7867-e8d7-9c3d55ec78ef@ashroe.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] common/octeontx: enable build only on 64bit Linux X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 25/03/2021 11:58, Kinsella, Ray: > On 25/03/2021 10:46, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 25/03/2021 11:42, Thomas Monjalon: > >> 24/03/2021 11:55, Jerin Jacob: > >>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:33 PM wrote: > >>>> > >>>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh > >>>> > >>>> Due to Linux kernel dependency, only enable build for 64bit Linux. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh > >>> > >>> Series Acked-by: Jerin Jacob > >> > >> I've reorganized the commits per family of drivers, > >> so it makes more sense than grouping per driver class > >> with "common/octeontx" for title for all: > >> > >> net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > >> common/octeontx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > >> common/octeontx2: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > >> > >> and applied. > > > > Actually not applied yet. > > I'm not sure what to do for the ABI check which is broken > > because some drivers are not compiled anymore in 32-bit build. > > I've workarounded locally by removing the dump files in the reference build. > > Should we add an exception in libabigail.abignore? > > > In the past we said that depreciating HW support would be considered to be same as an ABI Breakage. > > From the policy ... > "Updates to the minimum hardware requirements, which drop support for hardware which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI change." So the patches should wait 21.11. Everybody agree?