From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3981A00C5; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 21:55:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21B31DA47; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 21:55:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AED1DA45; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 21:55:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C145C006D; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 15:55:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 05 Jul 2020 15:55:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= OHK69q48Zt3oJf+KsQBBXxSXm3TZmUw6dye9DAMAjeA=; b=NpSzadrpm8EuAZzw s2Qai6z8xC9J5RQKytNJq6V5nzQNjbmEib1N2l8W24SCMEBddOJImEt2flWkQw5Y na5pW1buPC8YTnfje2jnOjE/G9NWTspVUcBS95jl0G6+Q62uiTTDl+SiPMvWoIL6 A6+V3qilKeIzI8Njp0UlJ16BZluL8EM13Gl9ENiqpDtLNQpNvJ0eQadpYjUBC9Pv vbCpVKXuzElT3DkS2EHSSpIMK4y6shAD3jYBtDQ3NotjGLFYWYFKknM9tikdApw0 2NFzKQ53qtKDjGZVpF4PsRjmXR6ptQskRtLlwhNTkpmaF6ENSo1s1QGNEoH0eX8b laTRwA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=OHK69q48Zt3oJf+KsQBBXxSXm3TZmUw6dye9DAMAj eA=; b=KjeIEce8TROwoHnYZJSYk6HqIHr0P1792GHDs5yh/fVfeUAKk5y2PQ903 nkX+EsP9ykDa34Iy/mlczPdbivF3nO8y4pyyULyKCAeOG+hCh4mpMARyWcdCLvCi MQlEG36OAtq5t72uv/ANk0amfMBkSc31HaOqC3qMdMXOGngtnA3BJbrZinpIVvmo qfIWBywSqFuzrmYAzOzOAU9qGCiuROAn0JGpL0S3DXB92ndEzExIxUZdwxLcRbjA d+CS+TruUbI2/gH/loroRNKuxS9pEiUYG3SZ1Cv8CzPoK1GgfJUkJ+VkG5hFNZV9 ttoJhXeWda5Dq9BoxRlwGBtocnddg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedruddugddugeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3A942306AAA8; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 15:55:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand Cc: dev@dpdk.org, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, techboard@dpdk.org, Jiayu Hu , Yipeng Wang , Sameh Gobriel , Vladimir Medvedkin , Nipun Gupta , Hemant Agrawal Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2020 21:55:41 +0200 Message-ID: <5479899.YojXWLVWEA@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200626081638.29890-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> References: <20200522065855.31056-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <20200626081638.29890-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Experimental/internal libraries cleanup X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" +Cc maintainers of the problematic libraries: - librte_fib - librte_rib - librte_gro - librte_member - librte_rawdev 26/06/2020 10:16, David Marchand: > Following discussions on the mailing list and the 05/20 TB meeting, here > is a series that drops the special versioning for non stable libraries. > > Two notes: > > - RIB/FIB library is not referenced in the API doxygen index, is this > intentional? Vladimir please, could you fix the miss in the doxygen index? > - I inspected MAINTAINERS: librte_gro, librte_member and librte_rawdev are > announced as experimental while their functions are part of the 20 > stable ABI (in .map files + no __rte_experimental marking). > Their fate must be discussed. I would suggest removing EXPERIMENTAL flag for gro, member and rawdev. They are probably already considered stable for a lot of users. Maintainers, are you OK to follow the ABI compatibility rules for these libraries? Do you feel these libraries are mature enough?