From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634EB5B09
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:53:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from was59-1-82-226-113-214.fbx.proxad.net ([82.226.113.214]
 helo=[192.168.0.10])
 by mail.droids-corp.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
 (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <olivier.matz@6wind.com>)
 id 1YEiTv-0000lb-Qo; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:57:22 +0100
Message-ID: <54C28A9E.6030303@6wind.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:53:34 +0100
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Liu, Jijiang" <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
References: <1421883395-27235-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
 <1421883395-27235-10-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
 <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01DB63D6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01DB63D6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 09/16] testpmd: move csum_show in a function
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:53:43 -0000

Hi Jijiang,

On 01/23/2015 12:03 PM, Liu, Jijiang wrote:
> +	/* display warnings if configuration is not supported by the NIC */
> +	rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
> +	if ((ol_flags & TESTPMD_TX_OFFLOAD_IP_CKSUM) &&
> +		(dev_info.tx_offload_capa & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM) == 0) {
> +		printf("Warning: hardware IP checksum enabled but not "
> +			"supported by port %d\n", port_id);
> +	}
> +	if ((ol_flags & TESTPMD_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM) &&
> +		(dev_info.tx_offload_capa & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM) == 0) {
> +		printf("Warning: hardware UDP checksum enabled but not "
> +			"supported by port %d\n", port_id);
> +	}
> +	if ((ol_flags & TESTPMD_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM) &&
> +		(dev_info.tx_offload_capa & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM) == 0) {
> +		printf("Warning: hardware TCP checksum enabled but not "
> +			"supported by port %d\n", port_id);
> +	}
> +	if ((ol_flags & TESTPMD_TX_OFFLOAD_SCTP_CKSUM) &&
> +		(dev_info.tx_offload_capa & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SCTP_CKSUM) == 0) {
> +		printf("Warning: hardware SCTP checksum enabled but not "
> +			"supported by port %d\n", port_id);
> +	}
> 
> The ESTPMD_TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IP_CKSUM  check is missed  here.

Yes, it should be added in this patch:
  ethdev: add outer IP offload capability flag

I'll do it for the next version.

Regards,
Olivier