From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DE8234 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:13:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2015 04:13:29 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,491,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="678527890" Received: from dwdohert-dpdk-fedora-20.ir.intel.com ([163.33.213.98]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2015 04:13:29 -0800 Message-ID: <54CB75FF.4090807@intel.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:15:59 +0000 From: Declan Doherty User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Wodkowski, PawelX" References: <1422362703-18868-1-git-send-email-pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com> <3047657.sxLCa6eQXg@xps13> <54CB6E1F.6040907@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Added missing extern 'C' decls in mode4 header files X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:13:32 -0000 On 30/01/15 12:11, Wodkowski, PawelX wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Doherty, Declan > > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 12:42 PM > > To: Wodkowski, PawelX; Thomas Monjalon > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Added missing extern 'C' decls in mode4 header > > files > > > > On 30/01/15 10:56, Wodkowski, PawelX wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > >>> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 11:21 AM > >>> To: Wodkowski, PawelX > >>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org > >>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Added missing extern 'C' decls in mode4 > > header > >>> files > >>> > >>> Hi Pawel, > >>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Pawel Wodkowski > >>>> --- > >>>> lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.h | 8 ++++++++ > >>>> lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_8023ad_private.h | 8 ++++++++ > >>> > >>> Why adding extern C in a private header file? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Thomas > >> > >> To be consistent with rte_eth_bond_private.h where it is included. > >> > >> > > > > We only need the decls on the public headers exported by the > > librte_pmd_bond makefile, so there is no need to modify > > rte_eth_bond_private.h as it should never be linked to directly by > > external code. > > I modified rte_eth_bond_8023ad_private.h not rte_eth_bond_private.h. > In rte_eth_bond_private.h those declarations are present already. > If so those declarations should be removed from rte_eth_bond_private.h. > > I can do this in v2 if you accept this. > Sure, that sounds good to me.