From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0110FA2EFC for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 18:27:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339361C29D; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 18:26:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71131C25E for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 18:26:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Oct 2019 09:26:28 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,296,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="201504271" Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.153]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2019 09:26:27 -0700 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.139]) by IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:26:27 +0100 From: "Singh, Jasvinder" To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v4 00/17] sched: subport level configuration of pipe nodes Thread-Index: AQHVgpr7amctusEiEkSybaXxc7XUFKdaUr7A Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:26:26 +0000 Message-ID: <54CBAA185211B4429112C315DA58FF6D3FE3E414@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20190926085232.47667-1-jasvinder.singh@intel.com> <20191014120951.152654-1-jasvinder.singh@intel.com> <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891268E942CA0@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891268E942CA0@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMGEwZGUxODQtNmRmNi00NDI2LWE3MmMtZjE0MmIzYjhlZDZjIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiQXdBTkVzOG8wajZuSDE2ZGtoWkx1bFhEZGtoNzA5OFNZQlRINDhcL09OQWxJZzB0c0pMSDJsNWZWTXlPZG1uMCsifQ== x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/17] sched: subport level configuration of pipe nodes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Dumitrescu, Cristian > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 3:24 PM > To: Singh, Jasvinder ; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 00/17] sched: subport level configuration of pipe = nodes >=20 >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Singh, Jasvinder > > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 1:10 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian > > Subject: [PATCH v4 00/17] sched: subport level configuration of pipe > > nodes > > > > This patchset refactors the dpdk qos sched library to allow subport > > level configuration flexibility of the pipe nodes. > > > > Currently, all parameters for the pipe nodes (subscribers) > > configuration are part of the port level structure which forces all > > groups of subscribers (pipes) in different subports to have similar > > configurations in terms of their number, queue sizes, traffic-classes, > > etc. > > > > The new implementation moves pipe nodes configuration parameters from > > port level to subport level structure. This allows different subports > > of the same port to have different configuration for the pipe nodes, > > for examples- number of pipes, queue sizes, pipe profiles, etc. > > > > In order to keep the implementation complexity under control, all > > pipes within the same subport share the same configuration for queue > > sizes. > > > > v4: > > - remove deprecation note > > - rebase on current dpdk head > > - add 64-bit values support > > >=20 > Hi Jasvinder, >=20 > I think the 64-bit counter support is a distinct unrelated feature, and I= suggest > we send a separate patchset for it. It also saves us re-reviewing the lar= ge > patchset that was already reviewed? >=20 I sent separate patches on 64-but counter support. Thanks.