DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet?
@ 2019-10-30 18:35 Gladchun, Glenn
  2019-10-31 15:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gladchun, Glenn @ 2019-10-30 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

Hi guys,

I stumbled upon this 11 month old post (https://narkive.com/ZwBXg4Xe) that goes over future enhancements to the scheduler.  All of them are vital, and I am especially interested in 16 TCs per pipe… Christian and/or Jasvinder, is the future here yet in some tangible shape or form?

Thanks,

Glenn G

This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet?
  2019-10-30 18:35 [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet? Gladchun, Glenn
@ 2019-10-31 15:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
  2019-10-31 17:45   ` Singh, Jasvinder
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2019-10-31 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gladchun, Glenn, dev; +Cc: Jasvinder Singh, Cristian Dumitrescu

On 10/30/2019 6:35 PM, Gladchun, Glenn wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> I stumbled upon this 11 month old post (https://narkive.com/ZwBXg4Xe) that goes over future enhancements to the scheduler.  All of them are vital, and I am especially interested in 16 TCs per pipe… Christian and/or Jasvinder, is the future here yet in some tangible shape or form?

cc'ed Jasvinder & Cristian.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Glenn G
> 
> This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
> If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
> this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet?
  2019-10-31 15:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2019-10-31 17:45   ` Singh, Jasvinder
  2019-11-01 19:32     ` Gladchun, Glenn
  2019-11-04  7:48     ` David Marchand
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Singh, Jasvinder @ 2019-10-31 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gladchun, Glenn, dev; +Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian, Yigit, Ferruh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 3:14 PM
> To: Gladchun, Glenn <ggladchun@idirect.net>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Singh, Jasvinder <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet?
> 
> On 10/30/2019 6:35 PM, Gladchun, Glenn wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I stumbled upon this 11 month old post (https://narkive.com/ZwBXg4Xe)
> that goes over future enhancements to the scheduler.  All of them are vital,
> and I am especially interested in 16 TCs per pipe… Christian and/or Jasvinder,
> is the future here yet in some tangible shape or form?
> 
> cc'ed Jasvinder & Cristian.
> 
> >

Hi Glenn,

The DPDK sched library has been modified to increase the number of traffic classes per pipe, please refer source code available on dpdk master to see the changes.

Thanks,
Jasvinder
  

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet?
  2019-10-31 17:45   ` Singh, Jasvinder
@ 2019-11-01 19:32     ` Gladchun, Glenn
  2019-11-04  7:48     ` David Marchand
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gladchun, Glenn @ 2019-11-01 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Singh, Jasvinder, dev; +Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian, Yigit, Ferruh

Jasvinder,

Thanks! Got confused by outdated documentation that still references old design...

Glenn

Sent from iPad
________________________________
From: Singh, Jasvinder <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 1:45 PM
To: Gladchun, Glenn; dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian; Yigit, Ferruh
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet?

***WARNING! THIS EMAIL ORIGINATES FROM OUTSIDE ST ENGINEERING IDIRECT.***

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 3:14 PM
> To: Gladchun, Glenn <ggladchun@idirect.net>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Singh, Jasvinder <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet?
>
> On 10/30/2019 6:35 PM, Gladchun, Glenn wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I stumbled upon this 11 month old post (https://narkive.com/ZwBXg4Xe<https://narkive.com/ZwBXg4Xe>)
> that goes over future enhancements to the scheduler. All of them are vital,
> and I am especially interested in 16 TCs per pipe… Christian and/or Jasvinder,
> is the future here yet in some tangible shape or form?
>
> cc'ed Jasvinder & Cristian.
>
> >

Hi Glenn,

The DPDK sched library has been modified to increase the number of traffic classes per pipe, please refer source code available on dpdk master to see the changes.

Thanks,
Jasvinder

This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet?
  2019-10-31 17:45   ` Singh, Jasvinder
  2019-11-01 19:32     ` Gladchun, Glenn
@ 2019-11-04  7:48     ` David Marchand
  2019-11-04 10:09       ` Singh, Jasvinder
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2019-11-04  7:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Singh, Jasvinder, Dumitrescu, Cristian
  Cc: Gladchun, Glenn, dev, Yigit, Ferruh, Thomas Monjalon

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:45 PM Singh, Jasvinder
<jasvinder.singh@intel.com> wrote:
> > On 10/30/2019 6:35 PM, Gladchun, Glenn wrote:
> > > I stumbled upon this 11 month old post (https://narkive.com/ZwBXg4Xe)
> > that goes over future enhancements to the scheduler.  All of them are vital,
> > and I am especially interested in 16 TCs per pipe… Christian and/or Jasvinder,
> > is the future here yet in some tangible shape or form?
> >
> The DPDK sched library has been modified to increase the number of traffic classes per pipe, please refer source code available on dpdk master to see the changes.

We need the fixes for the documentation.
These should have been part of the modifications.


Thanks.


--
David Marchand


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet?
  2019-11-04  7:48     ` David Marchand
@ 2019-11-04 10:09       ` Singh, Jasvinder
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Singh, Jasvinder @ 2019-11-04 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Marchand, Dumitrescu, Cristian
  Cc: Gladchun, Glenn, dev, Yigit, Ferruh, Thomas Monjalon



> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 4, 2019 7:48 AM
> To: Singh, Jasvinder <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> Cc: Gladchun, Glenn <ggladchun@idirect.net>; dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh
> <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet?
> 
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:45 PM Singh, Jasvinder
> <jasvinder.singh@intel.com> wrote:
> > > On 10/30/2019 6:35 PM, Gladchun, Glenn wrote:
> > > > I stumbled upon this 11 month old post
> > > > (https://narkive.com/ZwBXg4Xe)
> > > that goes over future enhancements to the scheduler.  All of them
> > > are vital, and I am especially interested in 16 TCs per pipe…
> > > Christian and/or Jasvinder, is the future here yet in some tangible shape
> or form?
> > >
> > The DPDK sched library has been modified to increase the number of traffic
> classes per pipe, please refer source code available on dpdk master to see
> the changes.
> 
> We need the fixes for the documentation.
> These should have been part of the modifications.
> 
> 
I have already sent patches on documentation updates.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet?
@ 2019-10-30 15:32 Gladchun, Glenn
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gladchun, Glenn @ 2019-10-30 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

Hi guys,

I stumbled upon this 11 month old post (https://narkive.com/ZwBXg4Xe) that goes over future enhancements to the scheduler.  All of them are vital, and I am especially interested in 16 TCs per pipe… Christian and/or Jasvinder, is the future here yet in some tangible shape or form?

Thanks,

Glenn G

This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-04 10:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-30 18:35 [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet? Gladchun, Glenn
2019-10-31 15:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-31 17:45   ` Singh, Jasvinder
2019-11-01 19:32     ` Gladchun, Glenn
2019-11-04  7:48     ` David Marchand
2019-11-04 10:09       ` Singh, Jasvinder
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-10-30 15:32 Gladchun, Glenn

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).