From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cunming.liang@intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF532A5B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 06:16:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2015 21:12:24 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,504,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="645982269"
Received: from shwdeisgchi017.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.239.66.47])
 ([10.239.66.47])
 by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2015 21:15:49 -0800
Message-ID: <54CF0805.8040103@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:15:49 +0800
From: "Liang, Cunming" <cunming.liang@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yerden Zhumabekov <e_zhumabekov@sts.kz>, dev@dpdk.org
References: <1409724351-23786-1-git-send-email-e_zhumabekov@sts.kz>
 <cover.1417092208.git.e_zhumabekov@sts.kz>
 <3fdc339aa3f0206ae2200937b9791af69e83409e.1417092208.git.e_zhumabekov@sts.kz>
In-Reply-To: <3fdc339aa3f0206ae2200937b9791af69e83409e.1417092208.git.e_zhumabekov@sts.kz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/7] hash: add assembly implementation of
 CRC32 intrinsics
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 05:16:08 -0000


On 1/29/2015 4:48 PM, Yerden Zhumabekov wrote:
> Added:
> - crc32c_sse42_u32() emits 'crc32l' asm instruction;
> - crc32c_sse42_u64() emits 'crc32q' asm instruction;
> - crc32c_sse42_u64_mimic(), wrapper in case of run on 32-bit platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yerden Zhumabekov <e_zhumabekov@sts.kz>
> ---
>   lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_crc.h |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_crc.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_crc.h
> index 4da7ca4..fe35996 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_crc.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_crc.h
> @@ -363,6 +363,40 @@ crc32c_2words(uint64_t data, uint32_t init_val)
>   	return crc;
>   }
>   
> +static inline uint32_t
> +crc32c_sse42_u32(uint32_t data, uint32_t init_val)
> +{
> +	__asm__ volatile(
> +			"crc32l %[data], %[init_val];"
> +			: [init_val] "+r" (init_val)
> +			: [data] "rm" (data));
> +	return init_val;
> +}
> +
> +static inline uint32_t
> +crc32c_sse42_u64(uint64_t data, uint64_t init_val)
> +{
> +	__asm__ volatile(
> +			"crc32q %[data], %[init_val];"
> +			: [init_val] "+r" (init_val)
> +			: [data] "rm" (data));
> +	return init_val;
> +}
[LCM] I'm curious about the benefit of replacing CRC32 intrinsic 
"_mm_crc32_u32/64".
> +
> +static inline uint32_t
> +crc32c_sse42_u64_mimic(uint64_t data, uint64_t init_val)
> +{
> +	union {
> +		uint32_t u32[2];
> +		uint64_t u64;
> +	} d;
> +
> +	d.u64 = data;
> +	init_val = crc32c_sse42_u32(d.u32[0], init_val);
> +	init_val = crc32c_sse42_u32(d.u32[1], init_val);
> +	return init_val;
> +}
> +
>   /**
>    * Use single crc32 instruction to perform a hash on a 4 byte value.
>    *