DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com>,
	Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
	Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
	Kiran Kumar K <kirankumark@marvell.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	Chenbo Xia <chenbo.xia@intel.com>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: remove legacy Rx descriptor done API
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 21:16:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5502102.FQXPWbTtxv@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210928154856.1015020-1-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>

28/09/2021 17:48, Andrew Rybchenko:
> rte_eth_rx_descriptor_status() should be used as a replacement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
[...]
> @@ -126,6 +126,10 @@ Removed Items
>    blacklist/whitelist are removed. Users must use the new
>    block/allow list arguments.
>  
> +* ethdev: Removed ``rx_descriptor_done`` dev_ops and
> +  ``rte_eth_rx_descriptor_done``.  Existing ``rte_eth_rx_descriptor_status``
> +  APIs can be used as a replacement.

I suggest this wording:

ethdev: Removed ``rte_eth_rx_descriptor_done`` API function and its driver callback.
It is replaced by the more complete function ``rte_eth_rx_descriptor_status``.

Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-05 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-28 15:48 Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-30 13:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-05 19:16 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-10-11 13:22   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-06  8:51 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-06  9:09   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-11 13:23     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-11 13:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-11 14:47   ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5502102.FQXPWbTtxv@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kirankumark@marvell.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).