From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C80AAC8 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 01:28:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7564B21B15; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 19:28:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 19:28:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=IjlDkYPhxg9I7FXAC/pZ1W5xDA kiF9TnFU020QcEnMU=; b=lFehkNjqtRa3yB0A57LhYNEAHDUbUMW2px8qWKjCGS EuzGNvL4GBkw7ZqjofKLGd6/ocr9NsYGjY/rolWhBCUhMSu4bCoeh0LYdehxPGv5 1iOqUNWTmW3KnBpX3/uyfW4qqVgDLF3l109mc5vwvOlCBqcreIB1ZbKFaKGB/48b g= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=IjlDkY Phxg9I7FXAC/pZ1W5xDAkiF9TnFU020QcEnMU=; b=lzb2iRMk4d8fKtp4u33KyI uPlbzMv/TjbuRjdyklGKoIcZJqmksqUVj2IcefDm9ifHBoQXZSj1D+S1x+UEpLT/ Ewas5sbwzt2rU+KMFpjmZlF1G9UTR64YmEEY3JyFic4mgD+RXRoMFtGc3DmmzxUI 5RzWbvKUp6rHE3ELm4nNKksFT6z3TY+afQn/9XOamfU25TtjG0Cbt4R5X5znrpnS RxSNnr+9H0KR9ssIWO7V6nULy9tT078jPx4epsykulU6jgIJPvYxRA8CmDJ3JTb2 KWWV4oeFXLFjtDeAIAJ00BdHAPawIYzBXWmfS14g79WQ5c/TGM6RPRXHBQSIm+wQ == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B68F1E4474; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 19:28:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Anatoly Burakov Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Tan, Jianfeng" Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 01:28:51 +0200 Message-ID: <5542280.5q6CTj2B3k@xps> In-Reply-To: <39d5ced1-0597-e529-3325-bbe7d94ae74b@intel.com> References: <648478c5ff8bcbe49306d96022eef1f89c7a935a.1523634914.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> <39d5ced1-0597-e529-3325-bbe7d94ae74b@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ipc: fix missing ignore message name X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 23:28:55 -0000 13/04/2018 18:16, Tan, Jianfeng: > > On 4/13/2018 11:55 PM, Anatoly Burakov wrote: > > We are trying to notify sender that response from current process > > should be ignored, but we didn't specify which request this response > > was for. Fix by copying request name from the original message. > > > > Fixes: 579a4ccc345c ("eal: ignore IPC messages until init is complete") > > Cc: anatoly.burakov@intel.com > > > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov > > Acked-by: Jianfeng Tan Applied, thanks