From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cunming.liang@intel.com>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8FBC3A6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 05:32:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 May 2015 20:32:50 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,404,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="723782051"
Received: from shwdeisgchi017.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.239.66.47])
 ([10.239.66.47])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 May 2015 20:32:51 -0700
Message-ID: <555022E0.7080406@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:32:48 +0800
From: "Liang, Cunming" <cunming.liang@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemming@brocade.com>
References: <1425012976-10173-1-git-send-email-cunming.liang@intel.com>	<1430804386-28949-1-git-send-email-cunming.liang@intel.com>	<1430804386-28949-3-git-send-email-cunming.liang@intel.com>
 <20150507195753.24518cfd@urahara>
In-Reply-To: <20150507195753.24518cfd@urahara>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 02/10] eal/linux: add rte_epoll_wait/ctl
 support
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 03:32:52 -0000



On 5/8/2015 10:57 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue,  5 May 2015 13:39:38 +0800
> Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> +	else if (rc < 0) {
>> +		/* epoll_wait fail */
>> +		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "epoll_wait returns with fail %s\n",
>> +			strerror(errno));
> In real application there maybe other random signals.
> Therefore the code should ignore and return for case of EWOULDBLOCK and EINTR
[LCM] Thanks, you're right, when EINTR happens, shall continue 
epoll_wait instead of return.
Per EWOULDBLOCK, seems epoll_wait won't return it, so I assume your 
mention is about epoll event read.