From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B61592A for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 15:40:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4JDe4fD030148 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 May 2015 09:40:05 -0400 Received: from tfherb.local (vpn-49-125.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.49.125]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4JDe42v026622; Tue, 19 May 2015 09:40:04 -0400 Message-ID: <555B3D34.3010803@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 09:40:04 -0400 From: Thomas F Herbert Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Monjalon , Bruce Richardson References: <1431450315-13179-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20150519112440.GE11036@bricha3-MOBL3> <2026064.Oq1YD3fb8T@xps13> In-Reply-To: <2026064.Oq1YD3fb8T@xps13> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/19] Move PMDs to drivers directory X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 13:40:07 -0000 On 5/19/15 8:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-05-19 12:24, Bruce Richardson: >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:14:59PM +0100, Mcnamara, John wrote: > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson >>> >>> Series Acked-by: John McNamara >>> >>> Note, due to 2 commits to i40e/base that were merged last night patch 08/19 fails on HEAD. >>> >>> If we are going to apply this patchset, and I think we should, then we should probably do it sooner rather than later since almost any change to the files in lib will require a respin of the patchset and it is quite large. >>> >>> John. >> Thomas, assuming there are no objections to this patchset, let me know when you >> are merging this in if you need another respin of patch 8 (or any other patches) >> in the set. I'm not going to respin for every driver change that causes issues, >> simply due to the patch sizes. > > I'm going to look at applying it shortly. > Don't worry for the rebase, I can manage it. I wasn't able to apply 05/19. However, since it is simple as it is just moving files and is likely to have been corrupted in transit. I think the patch is a good idea and I am confident your rebasing will catch any problems. --TFH > -- Thomas F Herbert Red Hat