From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f52.google.com (mail-lf0-f52.google.com [209.85.215.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D8B5686 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:40:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf0-f52.google.com with SMTP id l131so241211223lfl.2 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 05:40:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tWSqJnEH9ewttmh263jZ6eafOhea3FNjvnTfyPMQirg=; b=Dds/SHbYN++HYYC3dJIf5c2zYr5PZoMCQ74VyeYOgeOAblPZuMSzGlT86TzegCghIt lnyMY4c8KMwfIgU5UnG6iRY8s33CzSPd5zVxx4KXWb08+w2xkCZolfIeg8iqN6Hkca4k iPxqfzwILlBBfT5mtQVVpJsibxMmPOZ7UUpenpMtzi6SI9FftpwySSV9ikDYbmwqFSMu a2P0ZjKnYD60QZOfOM7dq6zr9yMaEDDe62WKwwlnKsEJFiPa5qyE3MGAiaM9O9Y7Quy1 /OgC4Nqs6B6nD7C055M17QQIqSqwOMXZ0Y01L0hlwXB3Z3bFVSQ3XDl9hm7K27JLhCC9 GU0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tWSqJnEH9ewttmh263jZ6eafOhea3FNjvnTfyPMQirg=; b=RUw82z2TDnn1PF1mLY8XdVyaazlKXC+CtOLk0snIWeedq2K8U8E60qcSgY5+NcYDEB dVvvMaaU7EDNhZw8kpMbExrGk01IBHCsuIsbtLV8LH2WKloVfBMrlhDDvt3Nsiayj8Mf VzXWkMvK82PABUyct2hbdcPF/xcJNkgn/E0R9P4d85AHJupYZjDncckfZUWiB9u6CH9r x2uUmc/H6Jbh/JwblIMfRFJHY7XcoMwWoXYZRtleGTfcqvA/OS0f2xMRh7HFkssgPIdD QvfyqgOYXKushFJoK/Lvx0k/GXKHpGIJt8gC8//irpoVIJR/xNSJLTIQDgA0D6uX2NSz aeDA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnBGO/xH/EQSz2KChtHSJbZF2NW7K5RnMVyREPdbSvcKaL4dAePFAqJL7tn5F1jbGUy X-Received: by 10.25.74.143 with SMTP id x137mr13190147lfa.10.1476708048057; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 05:40:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m63sm7768119lfm.25.2016.10.17.05.40.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 05:40:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: users@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org Cc: "O'Driscoll, Tim" , Hobywan Kenoby Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:40:45 +0200 Message-ID: <56798548.UUDuXfq43Z@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA675F6F33@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA675F0B5A@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA675F6F33@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] Project Governance and Linux Foundation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:40:50 -0000 2016-10-17 11:52, O'Driscoll, Tim: > From: Hobywan Kenoby > > The current DPDK version can run on virtually all processors (Intel, IBM > > and ARM) and leverage all NICs: is there **really** anyone questionning > > openness of the community? > > I still hear concerns on this, and based on discussions with others who > put their names to the post below, they do too. > I think it's a perception that we need to address. It is simple to address this perception with fact checking. The next releases will provide even more code for ARM and NPUs. If someone submits some good code and is ignored, it is easy enough to ping the mailing list and make it visible. If someone sees any regression on his architecture, we care. Please let's stop maintaining confusion on this topic. DPDK *is* truly open.